4 Fiscal Dominance

This page is a compilation of blog sections we have around this keyword. Each header is linked to the original blog. Each link in Italic is a link to another keyword. Since our content corner has now more than 4,500,000 articles, readers were asking for a feature that allows them to read/discover blogs that revolve around certain keywords.

The keyword 4 fiscal dominance has 2 sections. Narrow your search by selecting any of the keywords below:

• monetary policy (6)
• dsge model (3)
• government spending (2)
• exogenous shocks (2)
• fiscal monetary policies (2)
• public debt (2)
• fiscal policy (2)
• monetary authority (2)
• lump-sum transfers (2)
• policy coordination (2)
• central banks ability (2)
• sudanese pound (2)

1.What are the main features and assumptions of the DSGE model used in this blog?[Original Blog]

In this section, I will describe the main features and assumptions of the dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model used in this blog. The DSGE model is a framework for analyzing the behavior of the economy over time and under uncertainty. It consists of a set of equations that represent the optimal decisions of households, firms, and the government, as well as the market clearing conditions and the evolution of exogenous shocks. The model allows us to study how fiscal and monetary policies affect the macroeconomic variables of interest, such as output, inflation, interest rates, and public debt. The model also incorporates the possibility of fiscal dominance, which occurs when the fiscal authority does not respect the intertemporal budget constraint and forces the monetary authority to accommodate its spending needs by printing money. Fiscal dominance can have important implications for the effectiveness and credibility of monetary policy.

Some of the main features and assumptions of the DSGE model are:

1. Households. The model assumes that there is a representative household that maximizes its expected lifetime utility, which depends on consumption, leisure, and real money balances. The household faces a budget constraint that limits its spending to its income, which consists of wages, dividends, lump-sum transfers, and interest payments on bonds. The household can save or borrow by holding or issuing one-period nominal bonds. The household also pays taxes to the government and faces a cash-in-advance constraint that requires it to hold money to purchase goods.

2. Firms. The model assumes that there is a continuum of monopolistically competitive firms that produce differentiated goods using labor as the only input. The firms face a downward-sloping demand curve for their products and set prices subject to a Calvo-style price rigidity, which implies that only a fraction of firms can adjust their prices in each period. The firms also pay wages to the household, dividends to the owners, and taxes to the government.

3. Government. The model assumes that the government conducts fiscal and monetary policies. The fiscal policy consists of government spending, lump-sum transfers, and taxes. The government spending is assumed to be exogenous and follows an autoregressive process. The lump-sum transfers and taxes are determined by a fiscal rule that ensures the sustainability of the public debt in the long run. The monetary policy consists of setting the nominal interest rate according to a Taylor rule that responds to inflation and output deviations from their steady-state values. The monetary authority also supplies money to the economy to satisfy the money demand of the household.

4. Fiscal dominance. The model allows for the possibility of fiscal dominance, which occurs when the fiscal authority does not respect the intertemporal budget constraint and forces the monetary authority to accommodate its spending needs by printing money. This can happen when the public debt exceeds a certain threshold that depends on the fiscal rule parameters and the expected growth rate of the economy. When fiscal dominance occurs, the monetary authority loses its ability to control inflation and the nominal interest rate becomes irrelevant for the equilibrium determination. The model also allows for the possibility of regime switches between fiscal dominance and monetary dominance, which depend on the probability of a fiscal reform that restores the fiscal discipline.

5. Shocks. The model incorporates several exogenous shocks that affect the economy. These include productivity shocks, preference shocks, government spending shocks, money demand shocks, and fiscal reform shocks. The shocks are assumed to follow autoregressive processes with normally distributed innovations. The shocks generate fluctuations in the macroeconomic variables and create uncertainty for the agents. The model can be solved and simulated using numerical methods to obtain the impulse response functions and the variance decompositions of the variables.

---

2.Challenges and Limitations of Monetary Policy in Sudan[Original Blog]

1. Limited Policy Tools:

Monetary policy in Sudan faces significant challenges due to the limited range of policy tools available. The central bank's ability to influence the money supply is constrained by the country's underdeveloped financial system and the dominance of the informal sector. This limits the effectiveness of traditional policy measures, such as open market operations and reserve requirements. Additionally, the lack of a well-functioning interbank market hampers the transmission of monetary policy actions to the broader economy.

2. Inflationary Pressures:

Sudan has been grappling with high inflation rates for an extended period, posing a significant challenge for monetary policy. Inflation erodes the purchasing power of the Sudanese pound and undermines the effectiveness of monetary policy measures aimed at stabilizing the currency. The central bank's ability to control inflation is further complicated by supply-side factors, such as food price shocks and structural constraints, which are beyond the scope of monetary policy alone.

3. Exchange Rate Volatility:

The exchange rate regime in Sudan has been subject to frequent changes and volatility, creating uncertainty and challenges for monetary policy. In the past, the central bank has employed a fixed exchange rate regime, followed by a managed float system, and more recently, a managed float with a currency peg. These frequent shifts in exchange rate policies make it difficult for the central bank to maintain stability and predictability in the foreign exchange market, which has implications for inflation and economic growth.

4. Fiscal Dominance:

One of the major limitations of monetary policy in Sudan is the dominance of fiscal policy. The government's excessive borrowing from the central bank to finance budget deficits puts upward pressure on inflation and limits the central bank's ability to pursue an independent monetary policy. This phenomenon, known as fiscal dominance, undermines the effectiveness of monetary policy measures and hampers the central bank's ability to anchor inflation expectations.

5. Political and Economic Instability:

Sudan has experienced prolonged periods of political and economic instability, which present additional challenges for monetary policy. Political transitions, conflicts, and economic sanctions have disrupted the functioning of the financial system and hindered the central bank's ability to implement effective policy measures. Moreover, weak institutions and governance issues have led to a lack of credibility and trust in the central bank's policies, further complicating the effectiveness of monetary policy actions.

6. Policy Coordination:

Given the interconnectedness of monetary policy with fiscal, trade, and structural policies, the lack of coordination among different policy authorities in Sudan poses a significant challenge. Inconsistent policy actions and conflicting objectives can undermine the effectiveness of monetary policy measures. For instance, if fiscal policy pursues expansionary measures while monetary policy aims to curb inflation, their objectives may be at odds with each other. Enhancing policy coordination and cooperation among different authorities is crucial for achieving macroeconomic stability in Sudan.

In light of these challenges and limitations, it is evident that a comprehensive approach is required to address Sudan's monetary policy concerns. This may involve implementing structural reforms to develop a more robust financial system, enhancing transparency and accountability in fiscal policy, and establishing a more stable and predictable exchange rate regime. Additionally, fostering political stability, strengthening institutions, and improving policy coordination are essential for creating an enabling environment for effective monetary policy implementation.

---