This page is a compilation of blog sections we have around this keyword. Each header is linked to the original blog. Each link in Italic is a link to another keyword. Since our content corner has now more than 4,500,000 articles, readers were asking for a feature that allows them to read/discover blogs that revolve around certain keywords.

+ Free Help and discounts from FasterCapital!
Become a partner

The keyword inventive step has 181 sections. Narrow your search by selecting any of the keywords below:

76.What is intellectual property quality and why is it important?[Original Blog]

Intellectual property (IP) refers to the creations of the human mind, such as inventions, artistic works, designs, symbols, names, and images. IP is protected by law through patents, trademarks, copyrights, and other legal mechanisms. IP quality is the degree to which IP rights are valid, enforceable, and aligned with the objectives of the IP owners and users. IP quality is important for several reasons:

1. IP quality enhances innovation and creativity. By ensuring that IP rights are granted to novel, useful, and non-obvious inventions or works, IP quality encourages inventors and creators to invest in research and development, and to disclose their findings to the public. IP quality also prevents the duplication of efforts and the wastage of resources by avoiding the grant of IP rights to existing or trivial inventions or works.

2. IP quality fosters economic growth and social welfare. By providing incentives and rewards for innovation and creativity, IP quality stimulates the production and dissemination of new products, services, and knowledge that benefit society. IP quality also facilitates the transfer and diffusion of technology and culture across borders and sectors, and promotes fair competition and consumer protection in the market.

3. IP quality supports the rule of law and the public interest. By ensuring that IP rights are granted and enforced in accordance with the law and the principles of justice, IP quality upholds the rights and obligations of the IP owners and users, and balances their interests with those of the public. IP quality also prevents the abuse or misuse of IP rights that could harm the public health, safety, environment, or morality.

Some examples of IP quality issues are:

- Patent quality: The validity and enforceability of patents depend on the novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability of the patented inventions, as well as the clarity and sufficiency of the patent claims and specifications. Poor patent quality could result in the grant of undeserved or excessive patent rights that could hinder innovation, competition, and access to technology.

- Trademark quality: The distinctiveness and registrability of trademarks depend on the originality, descriptiveness, and likelihood of confusion of the trademarked signs, as well as the scope and classification of the trademarked goods and services. Poor trademark quality could result in the registration of generic, deceptive, or confusing trademarks that could mislead consumers, dilute brand value, or infringe on existing trademark rights.

- Copyright quality: The originality and protectability of copyrights depend on the creativity, expression, and fixation of the copyrighted works, as well as the duration and exceptions of the copyright protection. Poor copyright quality could result in the protection of unoriginal, derivative, or trivial works that could stifle creativity, diversity, and access to culture.

These are some of the aspects of IP quality and why it is important. I hope this helps you with your blog.


77.Legal Considerations[Original Blog]

One of the challenges that innovators face when developing artificial intelligence (AI) solutions is how to protect their intellectual property rights. AI innovations can be classified into two categories: AI inventions and AI-generated inventions. AI inventions are those that are created by humans using AI as a tool, such as a new algorithm or a novel application of machine learning. AI-generated inventions are those that are created by AI systems without human intervention, such as a new drug compound or a new design. The legal status of these two types of inventions differs across jurisdictions and poses some complex questions for patent law. In this section, we will explore some of the legal considerations that innovators should be aware of when patenting AI innovations. We will cover the following topics:

1. Patent eligibility: What are the criteria for patenting AI inventions and AI-generated inventions? How do different countries and regions define the patentable subject matter for AI innovations?

2. Inventorship and ownership: Who is the inventor and the owner of an AI invention or an AI-generated invention? How do different legal systems assign and recognize the rights and responsibilities of human and non-human inventors?

3. Disclosure and enablement: What are the requirements for disclosing and enabling an AI invention or an AI-generated invention? How can innovators ensure that their patent applications provide sufficient information and technical details for others to reproduce their inventions?

4. Novelty and inventive step: How are the novelty and inventive step of an AI invention or an AI-generated invention assessed? How can innovators avoid prior art and obviousness objections from patent examiners and competitors?

5. ethical and social implications: What are the ethical and social implications of patenting AI innovations? How can innovators balance the protection of their intellectual property rights with the promotion of public interest and social welfare?

Let us examine each of these topics in more detail.

1. Patent eligibility: Patent eligibility is the first hurdle that an AI innovation must overcome to be granted a patent. Patent eligibility refers to the question of whether the invention falls within the scope of patentable subject matter, which is defined by the patent laws and regulations of each jurisdiction. Generally speaking, patentable subject matter includes products and processes that are new, useful, and non-obvious. However, there are some exceptions and exclusions that may affect the patentability of AI innovations. For example, some jurisdictions exclude abstract ideas, mathematical formulas, natural phenomena, and mental processes from patentable subject matter, which may limit the patentability of AI algorithms and models. Similarly, some jurisdictions exclude computer programs, software, and business methods from patentable subject matter, which may limit the patentability of AI applications and systems. Furthermore, some jurisdictions have specific rules and guidelines for patenting AI inventions and AI-generated inventions, which may impose additional requirements or restrictions on the patent eligibility of AI innovations. For example, the European Patent Office (EPO) requires that AI inventions have a technical character and a technical effect, and that AI-generated inventions have a human inventor and a human contribution. Therefore, innovators should be aware of the patent eligibility criteria and the relevant exceptions and exclusions for AI innovations in their target markets and jurisdictions.

2. Inventorship and ownership: Inventorship and ownership are two important aspects of patent law that determine who has the right to apply for, obtain, and exploit a patent. Inventorship refers to the question of who made the inventive contribution to the invention, while ownership refers to the question of who owns the legal title and the economic benefits of the invention. In most jurisdictions, the inventor is the first owner of the patent, unless there is a contractual agreement or an employment relationship that transfers the ownership to another party. However, the issue of inventorship and ownership becomes more complicated when AI is involved in the creation of the invention. For AI inventions, the inventorship and ownership may depend on the degree of human involvement and control over the AI system, the nature and scope of the inventive contribution, and the contractual and employment arrangements between the human and the AI actors. For AI-generated inventions, the inventorship and ownership may depend on whether the AI system is considered as a legal person or a tool, whether the AI system has a legal capacity or a moral agency, and whether the AI system has a creative intention or a random output. Different jurisdictions have different approaches and perspectives on these issues, and some of them have not yet provided clear and consistent answers. For example, the United States patent and Trademark office (USPTO) and the EPO have recently rejected patent applications that named an AI system as the inventor, while the United Kingdom intellectual Property office (UKIPO) and the Australian Patent Office (APO) have accepted such applications for further examination. Therefore, innovators should be careful and cautious when determining and declaring the inventorship and ownership of AI inventions and AI-generated inventions.

Legal Considerations - Artificial intelligence: How to Develop and Patent Artificial Intelligence Innovations

Legal Considerations - Artificial intelligence: How to Develop and Patent Artificial Intelligence Innovations


78.Key Steps to Obtaining a Software Patent[Original Blog]

Obtaining a software patent can be a complex and intricate process, but it is crucial for protecting your innovative software inventions from potential infringement. In this section, we will delve into the key steps involved in obtaining a software patent, providing you with valuable insights from different perspectives to help you navigate through this challenging terrain.

1. Conduct a prior Art search:

Before filing a software patent application, it is essential to conduct a thorough prior art search. This involves examining existing patents, publications, and any other publicly available information that may be relevant to your invention. By conducting a comprehensive search, you can assess the novelty and non-obviousness of your software invention, which are crucial factors in determining patentability.

For instance, let's say you have developed a unique algorithm for optimizing search engine results. Before proceeding with the patent application, you should search engine algorithms. This step will help you understand whether your invention meets the criteria for patentability.

2. Draft a Detailed Patent Application:

Once you have completed the prior art search and confirmed the novelty of your software invention, the next step is to draft a detailed patent application. It is vital to provide a clear and concise description of your invention, including its technical aspects, functionality, and any unique features that differentiate it from existing solutions.

To illustrate, suppose you have developed a mobile application that uses artificial intelligence to enhance language translation accuracy. Your patent application should describe the specific algorithms, data structures, and machine learning techniques employed in your software. Including flowcharts, diagrams, and code snippets can further enhance the clarity and understanding of your invention.

3. Engage an Experienced Patent Attorney:

Navigating the intricacies of patent law can be daunting, especially when it comes to software patents. Engaging an experienced patent attorney specializing in software patents can greatly increase your chances of success. A skilled attorney will not only assist you in drafting a strong patent application but also provide valuable guidance throughout the entire process.

For example, a patent attorney with expertise in software patents can help you identify potential patentable aspects of your invention that you may have overlooked. They can also assist in drafting claims, which define the scope of protection you seek for your software invention.

4. File a Provisional or Non-Provisional Patent Application:

Once your patent application is ready, you have the option to file either a provisional or non-provisional patent application. A provisional application establishes an early filing date and allows you to use the phrase "patent pending" while giving you additional time to refine your invention before filing a non-provisional application.

On the other hand, a non-provisional application is the formal application that initiates the examination process by the patent office. It requires a more detailed description of your invention, including the claims that define the boundaries of your patent rights.

5. respond to Office actions:

After filing your non-provisional patent application, the patent office will review your submission and issue an office action. An office action may contain rejections, objections, or requests for clarification from the examiner. It is crucial to carefully analyze the office action and respond appropriately within the specified timeframe.

During this stage, it is common for patent examiners to raise objections related to the patentability of software inventions, such as claiming that the invention is merely an abstract idea or lacks inventive step. Your attorney can help craft persuasive arguments and amendments to overcome these objections and ensure the best possible outcome for your patent application.

6. Consider international Patent protection:

If you plan to market your software globally, considering international patent protection is essential. The process involves filing patent applications in individual countries or utilizing international treaties, such as the patent Cooperation treaty (PCT), to streamline the application process across multiple jurisdictions.

International patent protection provides you with broader coverage and helps safeguard your software invention from potential infringement in various markets. However, it is important to note that the requirements and procedures for obtaining software patents may vary significantly between countries.

Obtaining a software patent requires careful planning, meticulous drafting, and expert guidance throughout the process. By conducting a prior art search, drafting a detailed application, engaging an experienced patent attorney, filing the appropriate application, responding to office actions, and considering international patent protection, you can increase your chances of successfully obtaining a software patent while avoiding potential challenges posed by patent trolls.

You must, as an entrepreneur - if that's your position - be doing things that really move the needle.


79.How to respond to the examination reports and objections from the patent examiner and how to overcome them?[Original Blog]

Patent prosecution is the process of communicating with the patent office and responding to the examination reports and objections from the patent examiner. The examination reports are issued after the patent office conducts a search and analysis of the prior art and determines whether the patent application meets the requirements of patentability, such as novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The objections are the reasons why the patent examiner rejects or questions the patentability of the invention or the validity of the patent application. The patent applicant has the opportunity to overcome the objections by providing arguments, amendments, or evidence to support their case. In this section, we will discuss how to respond to the examination reports and objections from the patent examiner and how to overcome them from different perspectives, such as the patent applicant, the patent attorney, and the patent examiner.

Some of the insights and tips for responding to the examination reports and objections are:

1. Read and understand the examination report carefully. The examination report contains the patent examiner's findings and opinions on the patent application, as well as the relevant prior art references that are used to challenge the patentability of the invention. The patent applicant should read and understand the examination report thoroughly and identify the main issues and objections raised by the patent examiner. The patent applicant should also review the prior art references and compare them with their invention to assess the strength and weakness of their patent application.

2. Prepare a written response that addresses the issues and objections clearly and convincingly. The patent applicant should prepare a written response that responds to each issue and objection raised by the patent examiner in a logical and persuasive manner. The written response should include the following elements:

- A summary of the invention and the main features that distinguish it from the prior art. The patent applicant should briefly describe the invention and its technical advantages over the existing solutions. The patent applicant should also highlight the main features or aspects of the invention that are novel and inventive and that are not disclosed or suggested by the prior art references.

- A statement of the claims and the amendments, if any. The patent applicant should state the claims that are being pursued and the amendments that are being made to the claims, if any. The amendments should be made in accordance with the patent office rules and guidelines and should not introduce new matter or broaden the scope of the claims. The patent applicant should also explain the reasons and basis for the amendments and how they overcome the objections raised by the patent examiner.

- A detailed argument that refutes the objections and supports the patentability of the invention. The patent applicant should provide a detailed argument that refutes the objections raised by the patent examiner and supports the patentability of the invention. The argument should be based on the facts, evidence, and legal principles that are relevant to the patent application. The patent applicant should also cite the prior art references and explain why they do not disclose or render obvious the invention claimed in the patent application.

- A request for further action or communication, if necessary. The patent applicant should request for further action or communication from the patent examiner, if necessary. For example, the patent applicant may request for a grant of the patent, a further examination, a hearing, or a withdrawal of the patent application, depending on the outcome of the response.

3. Consult a patent attorney, if possible. The patent applicant may consult a patent attorney, if possible, to assist them in preparing and filing the written response. A patent attorney is a legal professional who specializes in patent law and practice and who can represent the patent applicant before the patent office. A patent attorney can provide the following benefits to the patent applicant:

- A patent attorney can provide expert advice and guidance on the patent prosecution process and the patentability of the invention. A patent attorney can advise the patent applicant on the patent prosecution process and the patentability of the invention. A patent attorney can also help the patent applicant to understand the examination report and the objections raised by the patent examiner and to formulate a suitable strategy to overcome them.

- A patent attorney can draft and file the written response in a professional and effective manner. A patent attorney can draft and file the written response in a professional and effective manner that complies with the patent office rules and guidelines and that addresses the issues and objections raised by the patent examiner in a clear and convincing manner. A patent attorney can also ensure that the written response is filed within the prescribed time limit and that the necessary fees are paid.

- A patent attorney can communicate and negotiate with the patent examiner on behalf of the patent applicant. A patent attorney can communicate and negotiate with the patent examiner on behalf of the patent applicant. A patent attorney can also attend hearings or interviews with the patent examiner, if required, and present the patent applicant's case in a persuasive and confident manner.

4. Understand the patent examiner's perspective and expectations. The patent applicant should understand the patent examiner's perspective and expectations when responding to the examination reports and objections. The patent examiner is a technical and legal expert who is responsible for examining the patent application and determining its patentability. The patent examiner's perspective and expectations are as follows:

- The patent examiner expects the patent applicant to provide a complete and accurate disclosure of the invention and the prior art. The patent examiner expects the patent applicant to provide a complete and accurate disclosure of the invention and the prior art that is relevant to the patent application. The patent examiner also expects the patent applicant to disclose any information that may affect the patentability of the invention, such as prior publications, public use, or sale of the invention.

- The patent examiner expects the patent applicant to claim the invention in a clear and concise manner. The patent examiner expects the patent applicant to claim the invention in a clear and concise manner that defines the scope and boundaries of the invention. The patent examiner also expects the patent applicant to claim the invention in a manner that is supported by the description and the drawings of the patent application and that does not encompass the prior art or obvious variations of the invention.

- The patent examiner expects the patent applicant to cooperate and communicate with the patent office in a timely and respectful manner. The patent examiner expects the patent applicant to cooperate and communicate with the patent office in a timely and respectful manner. The patent examiner also expects the patent applicant to respond to the examination reports and objections within the prescribed time limit and to provide the necessary information, arguments, amendments, or evidence to support their case.

These are some of the insights and tips for responding to the examination reports and objections from the patent examiner and how to overcome them. By following these steps, the patent applicant can increase their chances of obtaining a patent and securing their innovation.

My daughter has no interest in succeeding me in the business. She is going towards social entrepreneurship, an area she is interested in.


80.What are the key takeaways and best practices for biotechnology innovation and patenting?[Original Blog]

Biotechnology is a rapidly evolving field that offers immense opportunities for innovation and value creation. However, biotechnology innovation also poses significant challenges and risks, such as ethical, social, environmental, and regulatory issues. Therefore, it is essential for biotechnology innovators to protect their intellectual property rights and to follow the best practices for biotechnology patenting. In this section, we will summarize the key takeaways and best practices for biotechnology innovation and patenting, based on the insights from different perspectives, such as academic, industrial, legal, and policy.

Some of the key takeaways and best practices for biotechnology innovation and patenting are:

1. Understand the patent landscape and the patentability criteria for biotechnology inventions. Biotechnology inventions are subject to the same patentability criteria as any other inventions, such as novelty, inventive step, industrial applicability, and sufficiency of disclosure. However, biotechnology inventions also face specific challenges and limitations, such as the patentability of living organisms, genetic material, diagnostic methods, and therapeutic methods. Therefore, biotechnology innovators should conduct a thorough patent search and analysis to identify the existing and potential competitors, the gaps and opportunities in the market, and the patentability and validity of their inventions.

2. Develop a patent strategy and a patent portfolio that aligns with the business goals and the innovation process. Biotechnology innovation is often a complex and lengthy process that involves multiple stages, such as research and development, clinical trials, regulatory approval, and commercialization. Therefore, biotechnology innovators should develop a patent strategy and a patent portfolio that covers the different aspects and phases of their innovation process, such as the core technology, the applications, the improvements, and the variations. A patent strategy and a patent portfolio should also reflect the business goals and the competitive advantages of the biotechnology innovators, such as the target markets, the customer segments, the revenue streams, and the differentiation factors.

3. Collaborate and communicate with the relevant stakeholders and experts in the biotechnology ecosystem. Biotechnology innovation is often a collaborative and interdisciplinary endeavor that involves various stakeholders and experts, such as researchers, inventors, entrepreneurs, investors, lawyers, regulators, and policymakers. Therefore, biotechnology innovators should establish and maintain effective communication and collaboration with the relevant stakeholders and experts in the biotechnology ecosystem, such as by forming partnerships, alliances, networks, and consortia. Collaboration and communication can help biotechnology innovators to access the resources, expertise, feedback, and support that they need for their innovation and patenting activities.

4. adapt and respond to the changing trends and challenges in the biotechnology sector. Biotechnology is a dynamic and fast-changing sector that is influenced by various trends and challenges, such as the emergence of new technologies, the evolution of customer needs and preferences, the development of new regulations and policies, and the occurrence of unexpected events and crises. Therefore, biotechnology innovators should monitor and anticipate the changing trends and challenges in the biotechnology sector, and adapt and respond accordingly. Adaptation and response can help biotechnology innovators to seize the opportunities, mitigate the risks, and overcome the obstacles that they may encounter in their innovation and patenting activities.


81.How to leverage your biotechnology patent rights for commercial and social impact?[Original Blog]

Biotechnology is a field that has the potential to revolutionize many aspects of human life, from health and medicine to agriculture and environment. However, biotechnology also poses significant ethical, legal, and social challenges, especially when it comes to the protection and exploitation of intellectual property rights (IPRs). In this section, we will discuss how biotechnology innovators can leverage their patent rights for commercial and social impact, while also addressing some of the common pitfalls and controversies that may arise in the process. We will cover the following points:

1. Why patent biotechnology inventions? Patenting biotechnology inventions can provide several benefits for the innovators, such as securing exclusive rights to their inventions, attracting investors and partners, enhancing their reputation and credibility, and creating a source of revenue. Patents can also incentivize further research and development, and foster collaboration and knowledge sharing among different stakeholders. However, patenting biotechnology inventions also comes with some costs and risks, such as high fees and administrative burdens, complex and uncertain patentability criteria, potential infringement and litigation, and ethical and social objections.

2. How to patent biotechnology inventions? patenting biotechnology inventions requires following the general patent application process, which involves conducting a prior art search, drafting a patent specification, filing the application, and responding to the examination and grant procedures. However, biotechnology inventions also pose some specific challenges and issues, such as defining the scope and boundaries of the invention, disclosing the source and origin of biological materials, complying with the novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability requirements, and respecting the moral and public order exclusions.

3. How to commercialize biotechnology patents? Commercializing biotechnology patents can be done in various ways, such as licensing, selling, or transferring the patents to other parties, creating spin-offs or start-ups based on the patents, or collaborating with other entities in joint ventures or research consortia. Commercializing biotechnology patents can generate economic benefits for the patent holders, such as royalties, fees, profits, or equity shares. However, commercializing biotechnology patents also requires careful consideration of the market potential, the competitive landscape, the legal and contractual arrangements, and the social and environmental impacts of the patented products or processes.

4. How to create social impact with biotechnology patents? creating social impact with biotechnology patents means using the patents to address some of the pressing societal challenges or needs, such as improving health and well-being, enhancing food security and nutrition, protecting biodiversity and ecosystems, or promoting social justice and equity. Creating social impact with biotechnology patents can be achieved by adopting various strategies, such as engaging with the public and stakeholders, ensuring accessibility and affordability of the patented solutions, fostering innovation and capacity building in developing countries, or donating or licensing the patents for humanitarian or public interest purposes. However, creating social impact with biotechnology patents also entails balancing the interests and expectations of different actors, such as the patent holders, the users, the regulators, the funders, and the beneficiaries.


82.Patenting Genetic Engineering Inventions[Original Blog]

Genetic engineering is the process of modifying the genetic material of living organisms to create new traits or functions. It has many applications in fields such as medicine, agriculture, biotechnology, and industry. However, genetic engineering also raises ethical, social, and legal issues, especially when it comes to patenting the inventions that result from it. Patenting genetic engineering inventions is a complex and controversial topic that involves different perspectives and interests. In this section, we will explore some of the main aspects and challenges of patenting genetic engineering inventions, such as:

1. What is a patent and why is it important for genetic engineering? A patent is a legal right that grants the inventor or owner of an invention the exclusive right to make, use, sell, or license the invention for a limited period of time, usually 20 years. Patents are intended to encourage innovation and reward inventors for their creativity and investment. For genetic engineering, patents can provide incentives for research and development, protect the intellectual property rights of inventors, and facilitate the commercialization and dissemination of new products and technologies.

2. What are the criteria and requirements for patenting genetic engineering inventions? To be eligible for patent protection, a genetic engineering invention must meet three basic criteria: novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Novelty means that the invention must not be part of the existing state of the art, or the public knowledge that existed before the filing date of the patent application. Inventive step means that the invention must not be obvious to a person skilled in the relevant field of technology. Industrial applicability means that the invention must have a practical use or benefit in any kind of industry. In addition, a genetic engineering invention must also comply with the legal and ethical standards of the country or region where the patent is sought. For example, some countries or regions may exclude from patentability certain types of genetic engineering inventions, such as human embryos, animal varieties, or plant varieties.

3. What are the challenges and controversies of patenting genetic engineering inventions? Patenting genetic engineering inventions poses several challenges and controversies, such as:

- The scope and boundaries of patent claims. A patent claim is a statement that defines the essential features and limits of the invention. The scope and boundaries of patent claims for genetic engineering inventions can be difficult to determine and may vary depending on the type and level of modification, the function and utility of the invention, and the degree of similarity or difference with the natural counterpart. For example, how broad or narrow should a patent claim be for a genetically modified organism, a gene, a protein, or a DNA sequence? How much modification is required to make a genetic engineering invention novel and inventive? How similar or different should a genetic engineering invention be from the natural organism, gene, protein, or DNA sequence to avoid infringing existing patents or violating the principle of patent exhaustion?

- The balance between the rights and interests of patent holders and the public. A patent is a trade-off between the private rights and interests of the patent holder and the public interest in access to and use of the invention. The balance between these rights and interests can be challenging to achieve and maintain for genetic engineering inventions, especially when they involve issues such as public health, food security, environmental protection, biodiversity conservation, and human dignity. For example, how can patent holders ensure the fair and reasonable licensing and pricing of their genetic engineering inventions? How can the public benefit from the innovation and diffusion of genetic engineering inventions without compromising their safety, quality, and affordability? How can the public participate in the decision-making and governance of genetic engineering inventions and their impacts?

- The harmonization and coordination of patent laws and policies across different countries and regions. Patent laws and policies for genetic engineering inventions can vary significantly across different countries and regions, depending on their legal systems, cultural values, economic interests, and political agendas. This can create inconsistencies, uncertainties, and conflicts for patent applicants, patent holders, and patent users, as well as for regulators, policymakers, and stakeholders. For example, how can patent applicants and holders secure and enforce their patent rights in different jurisdictions? How can patent users avoid patent infringement or litigation in different jurisdictions? How can regulators, policymakers, and stakeholders cooperate and collaborate to establish and implement common standards and best practices for patenting genetic engineering inventions?


83.What is patent protection and why is it important for your product?[Original Blog]

Patent protection is a legal right that gives an inventor the right to exclude others from making, using, selling, or offering for sale any product or process that is based on the invention. Patent protection helps to ensure that new ideas and inventions can be freely shared with others and used to create new products and businesses.

Patents can be valuable assets for companies, as they may provide a way to protect new ideas from being stolen or copied by other companies. In addition, patents can help generate additional revenue by deterring competitors from developing similar products or services.

Patent protection is not guaranteed and may not be available for all inventions. In order to qualify for patent protection, an invention must be new (not already known to the public), involve an inventive step (i.e., a novel combination of elements), and be capable of being produced in a cost-effective manner. Furthermore, an invention must also meet certain other requirements set forth by the US patent and Trademark office (USPTO).

If you are interested in protecting your product with a patent, please contact an attorney who can advise you on the appropriate steps to take."

OSZAR »