Risk Comparisons

This page is a compilation of blog sections we have around this keyword. Each header is linked to the original blog. Each link in Italic is a link to another keyword. Since our content corner has now more than 4,500,000 articles, readers were asking for a feature that allows them to read/discover blogs that revolve around certain keywords.

The keyword risk comparisons has 2 sections. Narrow your search by selecting any of the keywords below:

• risk status (2)
• risk alerts (2)
• risk mitigation strategies (2)
• risk assessment (2)
• risk register (2)
• risk dashboard (2)
• risk report (2)
• data analysis (2)
• maximum drawdown (2)

1.Continuously Evaluating and Updating Risk Assessment Processes[Original Blog]

One of the most important aspects of business risk assessment is monitoring and review. This means that the risk assessment process should not be a one-time event, but rather a continuous cycle of evaluating and updating the risks that affect the business reliability ratings. Monitoring and review can help the business to identify new or emerging risks, track the progress and effectiveness of risk mitigation strategies, and adjust the risk assessment framework according to the changing internal and external environment. In this section, we will discuss how to conduct monitoring and review of the risk assessment process from different perspectives, and provide some examples of best practices and tools that can facilitate this task.

Some of the steps that can be followed for monitoring and review of the risk assessment process are:

1. Define the monitoring and review objectives and criteria. The first step is to determine what are the goals and expectations of the monitoring and review process, and how to measure them. For example, the objectives could be to ensure that the risk assessment process is aligned with the business strategy and objectives, that the risk mitigation actions are implemented and effective, and that the risk assessment results are communicated and reported to the relevant stakeholders. The criteria could be based on quantitative or qualitative indicators, such as risk scores, risk ratings, risk indicators, feedback, surveys, audits, etc.

2. Collect and analyze the monitoring and review data. The next step is to gather and examine the data that can provide insights into the performance and outcomes of the risk assessment process. The data sources could include internal or external sources, such as risk registers, risk reports, risk dashboards, risk surveys, risk audits, risk incidents, risk reviews, etc. The data analysis could involve various methods, such as descriptive statistics, trend analysis, gap analysis, root cause analysis, benchmarking, etc.

3. Identify and prioritize the monitoring and review findings. The third step is to identify and rank the findings that emerge from the data analysis. The findings could be positive or negative, such as strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats, gaps, issues, risks, etc. The prioritization could be based on the impact and likelihood of the findings, as well as the urgency and feasibility of addressing them. For example, a high-impact and high-likelihood finding that requires immediate action would be prioritized over a low-impact and low-likelihood finding that can be deferred or ignored.

4. Recommend and implement the monitoring and review actions. The final step is to propose and execute the actions that can address the findings and improve the risk assessment process. The actions could be corrective or preventive, such as updating the risk assessment framework, revising the risk identification and analysis methods, modifying the risk mitigation strategies, enhancing the risk communication and reporting mechanisms, etc. The implementation of the actions should be monitored and reviewed as well, to ensure that they are effective and efficient.

Some examples of monitoring and review tools that can assist the business in conducting the risk assessment process are:

- Risk register. A risk register is a document that records and tracks the risks that have been identified and assessed by the business. It typically includes information such as risk description, risk category, risk owner, risk score, risk rating, risk response, risk status, etc. A risk register can help the business to monitor and review the risk profile, the risk mitigation progress, and the risk changes over time.

- Risk report. A risk report is a document that summarizes and communicates the results and outcomes of the risk assessment process to the relevant stakeholders. It usually contains information such as risk objectives, risk scope, risk methodology, risk findings, risk recommendations, risk actions, etc. A risk report can help the business to monitor and review the risk performance, the risk alignment, and the risk feedback.

- Risk dashboard. A risk dashboard is a visual tool that displays and updates the key risk indicators and metrics that measure the risk assessment process. It often uses charts, graphs, tables, gauges, etc. To show information such as risk trends, risk comparisons, risk alerts, risk targets, etc. A risk dashboard can help the business to monitor and review the risk status, the risk effectiveness, and the risk alerts.

---

2.Pros and Cons of Maximum Drawdown[Original Blog]

Let's explore the pros and cons of using maximum drawdown as a risk metric:

Pros:

1. Easy to understand: Maximum drawdown is a straightforward metric that can be easily communicated and understood by investors.

2. Reflects real-world losses: By measuring the maximum loss experienced by an investment, maximum drawdown acknowledges the potential risks faced by investors.

3. Useful for risk comparisons: Comparing the maximum drawdowns of different investments can help investors assess the relative risk levels.

Cons:

1. Historical perspective: Maximum drawdown is based on past performance and may not accurately predict future losses.

2. Ignores frequency: Maximum drawdown does not consider the frequency of drawdowns, which can be relevant in assessing risk.

3. Single-point metric: Maximum drawdown focuses on the largest loss, disregarding the nature of losses experienced throughout the investment period.

While maximum drawdown has its limitations, it can still provide valuable insights when used in conjunction with other risk metrics.

---