Impairment: Mitigating Impairment Risks using Push Down Accounting

1. Introduction to Impairment Risks

Impairment risks are the potential losses that a company may incur due to the decline in the value of its assets. Impairment risks can arise from various factors, such as changes in market conditions, technological obsolescence, legal or regulatory issues, or deterioration in the performance of the assets. Impairment risks can affect the financial position and performance of a company, as well as its reputation and goodwill. Therefore, it is important for a company to identify, measure, and manage its impairment risks effectively. In this section, we will discuss some of the key aspects of impairment risks, such as:

1. The concept and definition of impairment. Impairment occurs when the carrying amount of an asset (or a group of assets) exceeds its recoverable amount. The carrying amount is the amount at which an asset is recognized in the balance sheet, net of any accumulated depreciation or amortization. The recoverable amount is the higher of the asset's fair value less costs of disposal and its value in use. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants. Value in use is the present value of the future cash flows expected to be derived from the asset or its cash-generating unit. If the carrying amount of an asset is higher than its recoverable amount, the asset is considered impaired and an impairment loss is recognized in the income statement.

2. The causes and indicators of impairment. Impairment can be caused by various internal or external factors that affect the value or performance of an asset. Some of the common causes of impairment are:

- Market decline. The fair value of an asset may decline due to changes in market conditions, such as lower demand, increased competition, or adverse economic trends. For example, a company may have invested in a new product line that fails to meet the expected sales or profitability targets due to the emergence of a superior substitute or a shift in consumer preferences.

- Technological obsolescence. The value in use of an asset may decrease due to the development of new technologies that render the asset obsolete or inefficient. For example, a company may have acquired a software license that becomes outdated or incompatible with the latest operating systems or hardware.

- Legal or regulatory issues. The value or utility of an asset may be impaired by changes in laws or regulations that affect the asset's operations or ownership. For example, a company may have purchased a patent that is challenged or invalidated by a court ruling or a regulatory authority.

- Deterioration in performance. The cash flows generated by an asset may decline due to factors such as poor management, operational inefficiencies, quality issues, or maintenance problems. For example, a company may have acquired a plant that suffers from frequent breakdowns, low productivity, or high operating costs.

A company should monitor the performance and condition of its assets regularly and look for any indicators of impairment. Some of the common indicators of impairment are:

- Significant decrease in market value. The fair value of an asset may be significantly lower than its carrying amount, as evidenced by market prices, appraisals, or other valuation techniques.

- Significant change in the use or strategy of the asset. The asset may be idle, discontinued, or restructured, indicating that it is no longer generating the expected cash flows or benefits.

- Significant adverse change in the business or economic environment. The asset may be affected by factors such as increased competition, lower demand, higher costs, or unfavorable exchange rates.

- Evidence of physical damage or obsolescence. The asset may be damaged, worn out, or outdated, affecting its functionality or efficiency.

- Evidence of impairment of a related asset or a cash-generating unit. The asset may be part of a larger group of assets that is collectively impaired, indicating that the individual asset may also be impaired.

3. The methods and challenges of measuring impairment. Measuring impairment involves estimating the recoverable amount of an asset and comparing it with its carrying amount. Depending on the nature and availability of information, a company may use different methods and assumptions to estimate the fair value and the value in use of an asset. Some of the common methods and challenges of measuring impairment are:

- Fair value less costs of disposal. This method involves estimating the amount that a company would receive if it sold the asset in an orderly transaction, net of any costs of disposal. The fair value can be estimated using various techniques, such as market prices, comparable transactions, or discounted cash flows. However, some of the challenges of using this method are:

- Lack of active or observable markets. The asset may not have a readily available or reliable market price, requiring the use of alternative valuation techniques or assumptions.

- Lack of comparable or recent transactions. The asset may not have any similar or recent transactions that can be used as a basis for comparison, requiring the use of adjustments or proxies.

- uncertainty and volatility of market conditions. The fair value of the asset may fluctuate significantly due to changes in market conditions, such as supply and demand, interest rates, or exchange rates, requiring the use of appropriate discount rates and risk adjustments.

- Value in use. This method involves estimating the present value of the future cash flows expected to be derived from the asset or its cash-generating unit, using a suitable discount rate. The cash flows can be projected based on the asset's current or expected performance, growth, and operating costs. However, some of the challenges of using this method are:

- Lack of reliable or consistent forecasts. The cash flows may be based on unrealistic or inconsistent assumptions, such as overly optimistic or pessimistic projections, or inconsistent growth rates or margins.

- Lack of sufficient or relevant data. The cash flows may not reflect the actual or potential performance of the asset, such as its capacity, utilization, or efficiency, or the impact of external factors, such as competition, regulation, or innovation.

- Complexity and subjectivity of discount rates. The discount rate may be difficult or subjective to determine, as it should reflect the time value of money, the risks and uncertainties associated with the asset, and the specific characteristics of the asset, such as its life cycle, cash flow patterns, or currency.

4. The accounting and reporting of impairment. Accounting and reporting of impairment involves recognizing and disclosing the impairment loss and its effects on the financial statements. The accounting and reporting of impairment may vary depending on the accounting standards and policies adopted by a company. However, some of the common aspects of accounting and reporting of impairment are:

- Recognition of impairment loss. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount. The impairment loss is measured as the difference between the carrying amount and the recoverable amount. The impairment loss is charged to the income statement, unless the asset is carried at revalued amount, in which case the impairment loss is recognized in other comprehensive income to the extent of any revaluation surplus. The impairment loss reduces the carrying amount of the asset to its recoverable amount, and the reduced carrying amount becomes the new basis for subsequent depreciation or amortization.

- Reversal of impairment loss. An impairment loss may be reversed if there is an indication that the impairment no longer exists or has decreased. The reversal of impairment loss is measured as the difference between the recoverable amount and the carrying amount of the asset. The reversal of impairment loss is recognized in the income statement, unless the asset is carried at revalued amount, in which case the reversal of impairment loss is recognized in other comprehensive income to the extent that it does not exceed the original revaluation surplus. The reversal of impairment loss increases the carrying amount of the asset to its recoverable amount, subject to a limit that the carrying amount does not exceed its original carrying amount net of depreciation or amortization. The increased carrying amount becomes the new basis for subsequent depreciation or amortization.

- Disclosure of impairment information. A company should disclose the information about the impairment of its assets, such as the amount and nature of impairment loss or reversal, the methods and assumptions used to measure the recoverable amount, the events and circumstances that led to the impairment or reversal, and the impact of impairment or reversal on the financial position and performance of the company.

This section has provided an overview of the concept, causes, indicators, methods, and accounting of impairment risks. Impairment risks are an important aspect of financial reporting and management, as they reflect the changes in the value and performance of a company's assets. By understanding and managing its impairment risks, a company can enhance its financial health and credibility. In the next section, we will discuss how a company can mitigate its impairment risks using push down accounting, a technique that allows a company to adjust the carrying amount of its assets to their fair value at the date of acquisition.

2. Understanding Push Down Accounting

Push down accounting is a method of accounting for the acquisition of a subsidiary or a segment of a business by a parent company. It involves recording the fair values of the acquired assets and liabilities in the subsidiary's separate financial statements, as well as the goodwill or bargain purchase gain arising from the acquisition. Push down accounting can have significant implications for the impairment assessment of the subsidiary's assets, as well as the recognition and measurement of deferred taxes. In this section, we will explore the benefits and challenges of push down accounting, the different approaches to applying it, and some examples of how it affects the impairment analysis.

Some of the benefits of push down accounting are:

- It provides a more accurate representation of the subsidiary's financial position and performance, as it reflects the current fair values of its assets and liabilities, rather than the historical costs.

- It simplifies the consolidation process, as it eliminates the need for adjustments to align the subsidiary's accounting policies with the parent's, and reduces the number of intercompany transactions and balances.

- It enhances the comparability of the subsidiary's financial statements with those of other entities in the same industry or market, as it reduces the diversity in accounting practices among acquirers.

- It facilitates the disposal or spin-off of the subsidiary, as it provides a clear basis for determining the gain or loss on the transaction.

Some of the challenges of push down accounting are:

- It may result in a significant increase in the subsidiary's assets and liabilities, which may affect its leverage ratios, debt covenants, and regulatory capital requirements.

- It may create volatility in the subsidiary's earnings, as it introduces additional sources of depreciation, amortization, and impairment charges, as well as deferred tax expenses or benefits.

- It may require a complex and costly valuation exercise to determine the fair values of the acquired assets and liabilities, as well as the allocation of the purchase price among them.

- It may not be consistent with the economic substance of the acquisition, as it implies that the subsidiary has incurred the acquisition debt and paid the acquisition premium, rather than the parent.

There are two main approaches to applying push down accounting: the full push down approach and the partial push down approach. The full push down approach involves pushing down the entire purchase price and the related acquisition debt to the subsidiary's financial statements, regardless of the percentage of ownership acquired by the parent. The partial push down approach involves pushing down only a proportionate share of the purchase price and the related acquisition debt to the subsidiary's financial statements, based on the percentage of ownership acquired by the parent. The choice of the approach depends on the accounting standards followed by the parent and the subsidiary, as well as the management's judgment and preference.

The following examples illustrate how push down accounting affects the impairment analysis of the subsidiary's assets:

- Example 1: Parent A acquires 100% of Subsidiary B for $100 million, which consists of $80 million of net identifiable assets and $20 million of goodwill. Parent A follows the full push down approach and records the acquisition in Subsidiary B's financial statements as follows:

| Assets | Liabilities |

| Cash | $10 million | Acquisition debt | $100 million |

| Inventory | $20 million | Accounts payable | $10 million |

| Property, plant and equipment | $50 million | |

| Goodwill | $20 million | |

| Total | $100 million | Total | $110 million |

Subsidiary B's net assets increase from $80 million to $100 million, and its net liabilities increase from $10 million to $110 million. Subsidiary B's goodwill is subject to an annual impairment test, and its property, plant and equipment is subject to an impairment test whenever there is an indication of impairment. Subsidiary B's impairment analysis will be based on the fair values of its assets and liabilities, rather than their historical costs.

- Example 2: Parent C acquires 60% of Subsidiary D for $60 million, which consists of $40 million of net identifiable assets and $20 million of goodwill. Parent C follows the partial push down approach and records the acquisition in Subsidiary D's financial statements as follows:

| Assets | Liabilities |

| Cash | $10 million | Acquisition debt | $60 million x 60% = $36 million |

| Inventory | $20 million | Accounts payable | $10 million |

| Property, plant and equipment | $50 million | |

| Goodwill | $20 million x 60% = $12 million | |

| Non-controlling interest | $20 million x 40% = $8 million | |

| Total | $100 million | Total | $54 million |

Subsidiary D's net assets increase from $40 million to $46 million, and its net liabilities increase from $10 million to $46 million. Subsidiary D's goodwill and non-controlling interest are subject to an annual impairment test, and its property, plant and equipment is subject to an impairment test whenever there is an indication of impairment. Subsidiary D's impairment analysis will be based on the fair values of its assets and liabilities, rather than their historical costs.

3. Identifying Impairment Indicators

One of the most challenging aspects of accounting for business combinations is determining whether the acquired assets and liabilities are impaired or not. Impairment occurs when the carrying amount of an asset or a liability exceeds its recoverable amount or fair value, respectively. Impairment can have a significant impact on the financial statements of the acquirer and the acquiree, as it may result in a reduction of net income, equity, and cash flows. Therefore, it is essential to identify the indicators of impairment and apply the appropriate accounting treatment to mitigate the impairment risks.

Some of the indicators of impairment are:

1. External indicators: These are the factors that affect the market conditions and the economic environment in which the entity operates. Some examples of external indicators are:

- A decline in the market value of the asset or the liability

- A change in the legal or regulatory framework that affects the asset or the liability

- A change in the technological, market, or industry trends that affects the demand or supply of the asset or the liability

- A change in the interest rates or exchange rates that affects the cash flows or the fair value of the asset or the liability

- A deterioration in the credit quality or the financial performance of the entity or its customers or suppliers

2. Internal indicators: These are the factors that affect the entity's operations and management decisions. Some examples of internal indicators are:

- A physical damage or obsolescence of the asset or the liability

- A change in the use or the expected use of the asset or the liability

- A change in the strategy or the business plan of the entity that affects the asset or the liability

- A change in the budget or the forecast of the entity that affects the cash flows or the fair value of the asset or the liability

- A change in the management or the key personnel of the entity that affects the asset or the liability

3. Push down accounting indicators: These are the factors that arise from the application of push down accounting in a business combination. Push down accounting is a method of accounting that allocates the purchase price paid by the acquirer to the assets and liabilities of the acquiree, and recognizes the goodwill or the bargain purchase gain in the separate financial statements of the acquiree. Some examples of push down accounting indicators are:

- A difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the asset or the liability in the acquiree's financial statements

- A difference between the useful life or the depreciation or amortization method of the asset or the liability in the acquirer's and the acquiree's financial statements

- A difference between the impairment test or the impairment loss recognition of the asset or the liability in the acquirer's and the acquiree's financial statements

- A difference between the deferred tax asset or liability or the income tax expense or benefit of the asset or the liability in the acquirer's and the acquiree's financial statements

To illustrate how these indicators can affect the impairment assessment, let us consider the following example:

- Company A acquires 100% of the shares of Company B for $100 million on January 1, 2024.

- Company B has a net book value of $80 million, which consists of $60 million of tangible assets, $20 million of intangible assets, and $0 of liabilities.

- The fair value of Company B's tangible assets is $70 million, and the fair value of its intangible assets is $30 million.

- company A applies push down accounting and allocates the purchase price to Company B's assets and liabilities, resulting in a goodwill of $0.

- On December 31, 2024, Company A performs an impairment test and determines that the recoverable amount of Company B's tangible assets is $65 million, and the recoverable amount of its intangible assets is $25 million.

- Company B also performs an impairment test and determines that the recoverable amount of its tangible assets is $60 million, and the recoverable amount of its intangible assets is $20 million.

In this example, we can identify the following impairment indicators:

- External indicators: The decline in the market value of Company B's assets may indicate that the economic conditions or the industry trends have changed adversely.

- Internal indicators: The change in the expected use of company B's assets may indicate that company A has a different strategy or business plan for company B than before the acquisition.

- Push down accounting indicators: The difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of Company B's assets in its financial statements may indicate that the purchase price allocation was not appropriate or accurate.

Based on these indicators, Company A and Company B should recognize an impairment loss of $10 million and $20 million, respectively, in their separate financial statements. This will reduce the carrying amount of Company B's assets to their recoverable amount, and reflect the impairment in their net income, equity, and cash flows.

4. Assessing Impairment Risks

One of the key challenges in accounting for business combinations is how to deal with the potential impairment of the acquired assets. Impairment occurs when the carrying amount of an asset or a group of assets exceeds its recoverable amount, which is the higher of its fair value less costs of disposal and its value in use. Impairment risks can arise from various factors, such as changes in market conditions, technological obsolescence, legal or regulatory issues, or poor performance of the acquired business. In this section, we will explore how to assess impairment risks and how to use push down accounting as a possible way to mitigate them. We will also discuss the advantages and disadvantages of push down accounting from different perspectives, such as the parent company, the subsidiary, and the external stakeholders.

To assess impairment risks, the following steps are usually involved:

1. identify the cash-generating unit (CGU): A CGU is the smallest group of assets that generates cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets or groups of assets. The identification of the CGU is important because it determines the level at which impairment testing is performed. For example, if the acquired business is integrated with the existing operations of the parent company, the CGU may be larger than the subsidiary itself. On the other hand, if the acquired business operates as a separate entity, the CGU may be the same as the subsidiary or even smaller, depending on the degree of interdependence among its assets.

2. Allocate the goodwill and other intangible assets to the CGU: Goodwill is the excess of the consideration transferred over the net identifiable assets acquired in a business combination. Other intangible assets are those that are not physically observable, such as patents, trademarks, customer relationships, or licenses. These assets are usually recognized at fair value at the acquisition date and are subject to impairment testing at least annually or whenever there is an indication of impairment. The allocation of goodwill and other intangible assets to the CGU is based on the expected benefits that the CGU will derive from them. For example, if the acquired business has a strong brand name that is expected to generate cash flows for the entire parent company, the goodwill and the brand name should be allocated to the parent company's CGU. On the other hand, if the acquired business has a specific technology that is only used by the subsidiary, the goodwill and the technology should be allocated to the subsidiary's CGU.

3. Compare the carrying amount of the CGU with its recoverable amount: The carrying amount of the CGU is the sum of the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities that are allocated to the CGU. The recoverable amount of the CGU is the higher of its fair value less costs of disposal and its value in use. Fair value less costs of disposal is the amount that could be obtained from selling the CGU in an orderly transaction between market participants, less the costs of disposal. Value in use is the present value of the future cash flows that the CGU is expected to generate, using a discount rate that reflects the current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the CGU. If the carrying amount of the CGU exceeds its recoverable amount, an impairment loss is recognized and allocated to the assets of the CGU, starting with goodwill and then with other intangible assets on a pro rata basis.

4. Review the impairment loss for possible reversal: An impairment loss can be reversed if there is an indication that the circumstances that led to the impairment have changed and the recoverable amount of the CGU has increased. However, a reversal of an impairment loss cannot exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined if no impairment loss had been recognized in prior periods. Moreover, a reversal of an impairment loss for goodwill is not allowed under any circumstances.

An alternative way to account for the acquired assets and liabilities in a business combination is to use push down accounting. Push down accounting is a method of accounting in which the parent company's basis of accounting for the acquired assets and liabilities is pushed down to the subsidiary's financial statements. This means that the subsidiary recognizes the fair values of the acquired assets and liabilities, the goodwill, and the non-controlling interest (if any) in its own financial statements, as if it had been the acquirer in the business combination. The subsidiary also recognizes the debt incurred by the parent company to finance the acquisition as its own debt and the interest expense as its own expense.

Push down accounting can have some advantages and disadvantages from different perspectives, such as:

- parent company: The parent company may benefit from push down accounting because it simplifies the consolidation process and eliminates the need for goodwill impairment testing at the parent level. However, the parent company may also face some drawbacks, such as losing the ability to defer taxes on the unrealized gains or losses on the acquired assets and liabilities, or having to recognize additional deferred tax liabilities or assets due to the different tax bases of the acquired assets and liabilities in the parent and the subsidiary jurisdictions.

- Subsidiary: The subsidiary may benefit from push down accounting because it reflects the economic reality of the acquisition and enhances the comparability of its financial statements with other entities in the same industry. However, the subsidiary may also face some challenges, such as having to adjust its accounting policies and systems to accommodate the new basis of accounting, or having to deal with the increased volatility of its earnings and equity due to the fair value adjustments and the goodwill impairment.

- External stakeholders: The external stakeholders, such as investors, creditors, regulators, or analysts, may benefit from push down accounting because it provides more transparent and relevant information about the performance and financial position of the subsidiary. However, the external stakeholders may also face some difficulties, such as having to understand the complex accounting adjustments and disclosures, or having to adjust their expectations and valuation models to account for the changes in the subsidiary's financial statements.

5. Applying Push Down Accounting Principles

Push down accounting is a method of accounting for the acquisition of a subsidiary by a parent company. It involves recording the fair values of the subsidiary's assets and liabilities at the date of acquisition, as well as any goodwill or bargain purchase gain arising from the transaction. Push down accounting can be useful for mitigating impairment risks, as it reflects the economic reality of the acquisition and aligns the subsidiary's financial statements with the parent's. In this section, we will discuss the following aspects of applying push down accounting principles:

1. The benefits and drawbacks of push down accounting

2. The criteria and guidance for applying push down accounting

3. The impact of push down accounting on impairment testing

4. The disclosure requirements and best practices for push down accounting

1. The benefits and drawbacks of push down accounting

Push down accounting has several advantages for both the parent and the subsidiary, such as:

- It provides a more accurate representation of the subsidiary's financial position and performance, as it reflects the fair values of its assets and liabilities at the date of acquisition.

- It simplifies the consolidation process, as it eliminates the need for adjustments to eliminate the subsidiary's historical carrying amounts and recognize the parent's acquisition-related costs.

- It facilitates the comparison of the subsidiary's financial statements with those of other entities in the same industry or market, as it reduces the effects of historical cost accounting and different accounting policies.

- It enhances the transparency and usefulness of the subsidiary's financial information for external users, such as creditors, regulators, and investors.

However, push down accounting also has some disadvantages and challenges, such as:

- It may result in a significant increase in the subsidiary's assets and liabilities, which may affect its financial ratios and covenants.

- It may create a mismatch between the subsidiary's income statement and cash flow statement, as the depreciation and amortization of the fair value adjustments may not correspond to the cash outflows for the acquisition.

- It may increase the complexity and cost of the subsidiary's accounting and reporting, as it requires the identification and measurement of the fair values of the acquired assets and liabilities, as well as the allocation of the purchase price to the subsidiary's net assets.

- It may cause confusion and inconsistency among the subsidiary's internal and external stakeholders, as it changes the subsidiary's historical financial information and may differ from the parent's accounting policy.

2. The criteria and guidance for applying push down accounting

Push down accounting is not mandatory under any accounting standard, but it is allowed or required by some regulators or jurisdictions. For example, the US securities and Exchange commission (SEC) requires push down accounting for subsidiaries that are 80% or more owned by the parent, and permits it for subsidiaries that are 50% to 80% owned by the parent. The international Accounting Standards board (IASB) does not provide specific guidance on push down accounting, but it does not prohibit it either, as long as it does not conflict with the principles of international Financial Reporting standards (IFRS).

Therefore, the decision to apply push down accounting depends on several factors, such as:

- The regulatory and legal environment of the parent and the subsidiary

- The accounting policies and practices of the parent and the subsidiary

- The expectations and needs of the users of the subsidiary's financial statements

- The materiality and significance of the acquisition and the fair value adjustments

If push down accounting is applied, the subsidiary should follow the same accounting principles and methods as the parent for the recognition and measurement of the acquired assets and liabilities, as well as the subsequent accounting for the goodwill or bargain purchase gain. The subsidiary should also apply the same accounting policies and estimates as the parent for the depreciation and amortization of the fair value adjustments, the impairment testing of the goodwill and other assets, and the recognition and measurement of any contingent liabilities or assets.

3. The impact of push down accounting on impairment testing

Push down accounting can have a significant impact on the impairment testing of the subsidiary's assets, especially the goodwill and the intangible assets with indefinite useful lives. This is because push down accounting may increase the carrying amount of these assets, as well as change the composition and allocation of the cash-generating units (CGUs) to which they belong.

The impairment testing of the goodwill and the intangible assets with indefinite useful lives should be performed at least annually, or more frequently if there is an indication of impairment. The impairment test involves comparing the recoverable amount of the CGU (or the individual asset) with its carrying amount, and recognizing an impairment loss if the recoverable amount is lower than the carrying amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of the fair value less costs of disposal and the value in use of the CGU (or the individual asset).

The fair value less costs of disposal is the amount that could be obtained from selling the CGU (or the individual asset) in an orderly transaction between market participants, less the costs of disposal. The value in use is the present value of the future cash flows expected to be derived from the CGU (or the individual asset), using a discount rate that reflects the current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the CGU (or the individual asset).

Push down accounting may affect the fair value less costs of disposal and the value in use of the CGU (or the individual asset) in different ways, depending on the nature and magnitude of the fair value adjustments, the expected synergies and benefits from the acquisition, and the market conditions and expectations. For example, push down accounting may:

- Increase the fair value less costs of disposal and the value in use of the CGU (or the individual asset), if the fair value adjustments reflect the higher quality or potential of the acquired assets and liabilities, and the expected synergies and benefits from the acquisition are realized or exceed the market expectations.

- Decrease the fair value less costs of disposal and the value in use of the CGU (or the individual asset), if the fair value adjustments reflect the lower quality or potential of the acquired assets and liabilities, and the expected synergies and benefits from the acquisition are not realized or fall short of the market expectations.

- Have no impact or an uncertain impact on the fair value less costs of disposal and the value in use of the CGU (or the individual asset), if the fair value adjustments are offset by the goodwill or the bargain purchase gain, or if the market conditions and expectations are volatile or unpredictable.

Therefore, the subsidiary should carefully assess the impact of push down accounting on the impairment testing of its assets, and use appropriate assumptions and estimates that reflect the best available information and evidence.

4. The disclosure requirements and best practices for push down accounting

Push down accounting requires the subsidiary to provide sufficient and relevant disclosures in its financial statements, to enable the users to understand the nature and effect of the acquisition and the fair value adjustments. The disclosure requirements and best practices for push down accounting include:

- The date and description of the acquisition, the name and principal activities of the subsidiary, and the percentage of ownership and voting rights acquired by the parent

- The reasons and objectives for the acquisition, and the expected synergies and benefits from the acquisition

- The purchase price and the consideration transferred by the parent, and the allocation of the purchase price to the subsidiary's net assets at the date of acquisition, including the fair values of the acquired assets and liabilities, and the goodwill or the bargain purchase gain recognized

- The accounting policy and rationale for applying push down accounting, and the impact of push down accounting on the subsidiary's financial position and performance, including the amount and nature of the fair value adjustments, and the depreciation and amortization of the fair value adjustments

- The results of the impairment testing of the goodwill and the intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, including the recoverable amount and the key assumptions and estimates used

- The significant judgments and estimates involved in the identification and measurement of the fair values of the acquired assets and liabilities, and the allocation of the purchase price to the subsidiary's net assets

- The sensitivity analysis of the fair values of the acquired assets and liabilities, and the goodwill or the bargain purchase gain, to changes in the key assumptions and estimates

- The comparison of the subsidiary's financial information before and after the application of push down accounting, and the explanation of the major differences and reconciliations

- The disclosure of any contingent liabilities or assets arising from the acquisition, and the recognition and measurement of any subsequent changes or settlements

Push down accounting is a complex and challenging method of accounting for the acquisition of a subsidiary by a parent company. It can have significant implications for the subsidiary's financial statements and impairment testing. Therefore, the subsidiary should carefully weigh the benefits and drawbacks of push down accounting, and follow the criteria and guidance for applying push down accounting principles. The subsidiary should also provide adequate and transparent disclosures in its financial statements, to inform and educate the users of the subsidiary's financial information.

6. Mitigation Strategies for Impairment Risks

Impairment risks are the possibility that the carrying amount of an asset or a group of assets exceeds its recoverable amount. Impairment risks can arise due to various factors, such as changes in market conditions, technological obsolescence, deterioration in quality, or legal restrictions. Impairment risks can have a negative impact on the financial performance and position of a company, as well as its reputation and goodwill. Therefore, it is important to adopt effective mitigation strategies to prevent or reduce impairment losses. Some of the mitigation strategies for impairment risks are:

1. push down accounting: Push down accounting is a method of accounting for the acquisition of a subsidiary or a business unit, where the acquirer allocates the purchase price to the identifiable assets and liabilities of the acquiree, and records the excess as goodwill. Push down accounting can help mitigate impairment risks by aligning the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities with their fair values at the date of acquisition, and by reducing the amount of goodwill that is subject to impairment testing. Push down accounting can also provide more relevant and transparent information to the users of the financial statements, as it reflects the economic reality of the acquisition. However, push down accounting also has some drawbacks, such as increasing the complexity and cost of accounting, creating inconsistencies with the parent company's accounting policies, and affecting the tax implications of the acquisition.

2. impairment testing: Impairment testing is a process of comparing the carrying amount of an asset or a group of assets with its recoverable amount, and recognizing an impairment loss if the former exceeds the latter. impairment testing can help mitigate impairment risks by identifying and measuring the impairment losses in a timely manner, and by adjusting the carrying amounts of the assets to their recoverable amounts. Impairment testing can also enhance the reliability and comparability of the financial statements, as it reflects the current condition and value of the assets. However, impairment testing also has some challenges, such as determining the appropriate level of aggregation for the assets, estimating the recoverable amount using various assumptions and estimates, and applying the impairment indicators and triggers consistently and objectively.

3. Asset disposal or restructuring: Asset disposal or restructuring is a strategy of selling, abandoning, or reorganizing the assets or the business units that are impaired or underperforming. Asset disposal or restructuring can help mitigate impairment risks by eliminating or reducing the sources of impairment losses, and by generating cash flows or improving the efficiency and profitability of the remaining assets or business units. Asset disposal or restructuring can also provide strategic benefits, such as focusing on the core competencies, enhancing the competitive advantage, or diversifying the portfolio. However, asset disposal or restructuring also has some risks, such as losing the potential synergies, incurring transaction costs or taxes, or facing legal or regulatory issues.

7. Financial Reporting Implications

One of the main challenges of dealing with impairment is how to report its effects on the financial statements of the parent company and its subsidiaries. Impairment can have a significant impact on the assets, liabilities, equity, income, and cash flows of the reporting entity. However, different accounting standards and methods may result in different impairment measurements and disclosures. In this section, we will explore some of the financial reporting implications of impairment, and how push down accounting can help mitigate some of the impairment risks. We will also discuss some of the advantages and disadvantages of push down accounting from different perspectives, such as the parent company, the subsidiary, the auditors, and the users of the financial statements.

Some of the financial reporting implications of impairment are:

1. Impairment loss recognition: Impairment occurs when the carrying amount of an asset or a cash-generating unit (CGU) exceeds its recoverable amount, which is the higher of its fair value less costs of disposal and its value in use. Impairment loss is the difference between the carrying amount and the recoverable amount, and it reduces the carrying amount of the asset or the CGU. Impairment loss is recognized in profit or loss, unless the asset is carried at revalued amount, in which case the impairment loss is recognized in other comprehensive income to the extent of any revaluation surplus. Impairment loss recognition affects the income statement, the balance sheet, and the statement of changes in equity of the reporting entity.

2. Impairment reversal: Impairment loss may be reversed if there is an indication that the impairment no longer exists or has decreased. However, the reversal of impairment loss cannot increase the carrying amount of the asset or the CGU above its carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognized in prior periods. Impairment reversal is recognized in profit or loss, unless the asset is carried at revalued amount, in which case the reversal of impairment loss is recognized in other comprehensive income to the extent of any revaluation surplus. Impairment reversal affects the income statement, the balance sheet, and the statement of changes in equity of the reporting entity.

3. Impairment testing: Impairment testing is the process of comparing the carrying amount of an asset or a CGU with its recoverable amount. Impairment testing is required at least annually for goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, and whenever there is an indication that an asset or a CGU may be impaired. Impairment testing involves significant judgments and estimates, such as the identification of CGUs, the determination of fair value less costs of disposal and value in use, the selection of discount rates and growth rates, and the allocation of goodwill and corporate assets to CGUs. Impairment testing affects the notes to the financial statements of the reporting entity, where the key assumptions and sensitivities of the impairment testing are disclosed.

4. Push down accounting: Push down accounting is an accounting method that allows the parent company to push down the fair value adjustments and goodwill arising from a business combination to the separate financial statements of the subsidiary. Push down accounting can help mitigate some of the impairment risks by aligning the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities of the subsidiary with their fair values, and by allocating the goodwill to the CGUs of the subsidiary. Push down accounting can also simplify the consolidation process and enhance the comparability and usefulness of the financial statements of the subsidiary. However, push down accounting also has some drawbacks, such as the potential loss of historical cost information, the possible inconsistency with the local accounting standards and tax laws, and the increased complexity and cost of the accounting and auditing procedures.

An example of push down accounting is:

- Parent Co. Acquires 100% of Sub Co. For $1,000,000, which consists of $800,000 of identifiable net assets and $200,000 of goodwill.

- Parent Co. Decides to apply push down accounting to Sub Co.'s separate financial statements.

- Sub Co.'s identifiable net assets are adjusted to their fair values, which are $900,000. The difference of $100,000 is recognized as a gain in Sub Co.'s income statement.

- Sub Co.'s goodwill is increased by $200,000, which is allocated to its CGUs based on their relative fair values.

- Sub Co.'s equity is increased by $300,000, which is the sum of the gain and the goodwill. The increase in equity is presented as a contribution from Parent Co. In Sub Co.'s statement of changes in equity.

8. Case Studies on Impairment Mitigation

Impairment is a serious issue that can affect the value of assets and liabilities of a business. Impairment occurs when the carrying amount of an asset or a group of assets exceeds its recoverable amount, which is the higher of its fair value less costs of disposal and its value in use. Impairment can result from various factors, such as changes in market conditions, technological obsolescence, legal restrictions, or damage to the assets. Impairment can have a negative impact on the financial performance and position of a business, as it reduces the net income and the net assets of the entity.

One of the ways to mitigate the impairment risks is to use push down accounting. Push down accounting is a method of accounting that applies the fair values of the assets and liabilities of an acquired entity to its separate financial statements, as if the entity had been purchased by itself. Push down accounting can reduce the risk of impairment by aligning the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities with their fair values at the acquisition date. This can also provide more relevant and transparent information to the users of the financial statements, as they can see the effects of the acquisition on the acquired entity.

To illustrate how push down accounting can mitigate impairment risks, we will look at some case studies of different scenarios. We will compare the results of using push down accounting versus not using push down accounting, and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of each method.

1. Case Study 1: Acquisition of a profitable entity with undervalued assets

Suppose that Entity A acquires 100% of Entity B for $1,000,000. The net assets of Entity B at the acquisition date are $800,000, consisting of $500,000 of inventory and $300,000 of property, plant and equipment (PPE). However, the fair values of the inventory and the PPE are $600,000 and $400,000 respectively, reflecting the higher market prices of the goods and the lower depreciation rates of the assets. Entity B generates a net income of $100,000 per year.

If Entity A does not use push down accounting, the separate financial statements of Entity B will show the following:

- Inventory: $500,000

- PPE: $300,000

- Net assets: $800,000

- Net income: $100,000

If Entity A uses push down accounting, the separate financial statements of Entity B will show the following:

- Inventory: $600,000

- PPE: $400,000

- Goodwill: $200,000 (calculated as $1,000,000 - $800,000)

- Net assets: $1,200,000

- Net income: $100,000

The advantages of using push down accounting in this case are:

- The carrying amounts of the inventory and the PPE reflect their fair values, which are more relevant and reliable than the historical costs.

- The goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets, which captures the synergies and the future benefits of the acquisition.

- The risk of impairment is reduced, as the assets are less likely to be overvalued compared to their recoverable amounts.

The disadvantages of using push down accounting in this case are:

- The net assets of Entity B are increased by $400,000, which may not reflect the true economic value of the entity, as the goodwill may not be realized in the future.

- The net income of Entity B is unchanged, which may not reflect the true profitability of the entity, as the depreciation and the amortization expenses are based on the fair values of the assets and the goodwill, rather than the historical costs.

2. Case Study 2: Acquisition of a loss-making entity with overvalued assets

Suppose that Entity C acquires 100% of Entity D for $500,000. The net assets of Entity D at the acquisition date are $700,000, consisting of $400,000 of inventory and $300,000 of PPE. However, the fair values of the inventory and the PPE are $300,000 and $200,000 respectively, reflecting the lower market prices of the goods and the higher depreciation rates of the assets. Entity D generates a net loss of $50,000 per year.

If Entity C does not use push down accounting, the separate financial statements of Entity D will show the following:

- Inventory: $400,000

- PPE: $300,000

- Net assets: $700,000

- Net loss: $50,000

If Entity C uses push down accounting, the separate financial statements of Entity D will show the following:

- Inventory: $300,000

- PPE: $200,000

- Negative goodwill: $200,000 (calculated as $500,000 - $700,000)

- Net assets: $300,000

- Net loss: $50,000

The advantages of using push down accounting in this case are:

- The carrying amounts of the inventory and the PPE reflect their fair values, which are more relevant and reliable than the historical costs.

- The negative goodwill represents the excess of the fair value of the net assets over the purchase price, which captures the bargain purchase and the future losses of the acquisition.

- The risk of impairment is reduced, as the assets are more likely to be undervalued compared to their recoverable amounts.

The disadvantages of using push down accounting in this case are:

- The net assets of Entity D are decreased by $400,000, which may not reflect the true economic value of the entity, as the negative goodwill may not be realized in the future.

- The net loss of Entity D is unchanged, which may not reflect the true profitability of the entity, as the depreciation and the amortization expenses are based on the fair values of the assets and the negative goodwill, rather than the historical costs.

9. Conclusion and Best Practices

In this section, we will summarize the main points of the blog and provide some best practices for mitigating impairment risks using push down accounting. Push down accounting is a method of accounting for the acquisition of a subsidiary by allocating the purchase price to the subsidiary's assets and liabilities. This can result in the recognition of goodwill and other intangible assets on the subsidiary's balance sheet, which may be subject to impairment testing in the future. Impairment occurs when the carrying amount of an asset or a cash-generating unit exceeds its recoverable amount. Impairment can have a negative impact on the financial performance and position of the subsidiary and the parent company. Therefore, it is important to adopt some strategies to reduce the likelihood and magnitude of impairment. Some of the best practices are:

- 1. Perform a thorough due diligence before the acquisition. This can help to identify the fair value of the subsidiary's assets and liabilities, and avoid overpaying for the acquisition. It can also help to assess the potential synergies and risks of the acquisition, and plan for the integration of the subsidiary into the parent company.

- 2. Monitor the performance and cash flows of the subsidiary regularly. This can help to detect any signs of deterioration or impairment in the subsidiary's operations, and take timely actions to address them. It can also help to update the assumptions and estimates used in the impairment testing, and ensure that they reflect the current and expected conditions of the subsidiary and the market.

- 3. Apply consistent and appropriate accounting policies and methods for the subsidiary. This can help to ensure that the subsidiary's financial statements are comparable and consistent with the parent company's financial statements, and comply with the relevant accounting standards and regulations. It can also help to avoid any accounting mismatches or errors that could affect the impairment testing and measurement.

- 4. Conduct a robust and reliable impairment testing and measurement process. This can help to identify and measure any impairment losses accurately and timely, and disclose them in the financial statements. It can also help to provide useful information to the stakeholders and investors about the performance and value of the subsidiary and the parent company.

These are some of the best practices that can help to mitigate impairment risks using push down accounting. By following these practices, the parent company and the subsidiary can benefit from the advantages of push down accounting, such as improved transparency, comparability, and efficiency, while minimizing the disadvantages, such as increased impairment exposure, complexity, and costs.

Read Other Blogs