This page is a compilation of blog sections we have around this keyword. Each header is linked to the original blog. Each link in Italic is a link to another keyword. Since our content corner has now more than 4,500,000 articles, readers were asking for a feature that allows them to read/discover blogs that revolve around certain keywords.

+ Free Help and discounts from FasterCapital!
Become a partner

The keyword secured claim has 74 sections. Narrow your search by selecting any of the keywords below:

1.How Secured Creditors are Paid in Bankruptcy?[Original Blog]

Secured creditors play a crucial role in the bankruptcy process. These creditors have a security interest in the debtor's property, which means they have a legal right to seize and sell the property if the debtor fails to repay the debt. In bankruptcy, secured creditors have a higher priority than unsecured creditors, which means they are paid first from the debtor's assets. However, the process of paying secured creditors in bankruptcy can be complex and depends on several factors.

1. Automatic Stay

When a debtor files for bankruptcy, an automatic stay goes into effect. This stay prohibits creditors from pursuing any collection activities against the debtor, including seizing the debtor's property. The automatic stay gives the debtor time to reorganize their finances and come up with a repayment plan. However, secured creditors can ask the court to lift the automatic stay so they can seize and sell the debtor's property.

2. Secured Claims

Secured creditors are paid from the debtor's assets based on the value of their security interest. The amount of the secured claim is usually equal to the value of the collateral, minus any outstanding debt. For example, if a debtor owes $10,000 on a car worth $15,000, the secured claim is $5,000. The debtor must pay the secured claim in full before any unsecured creditors receive payment.

3. Priority Claims

In some cases, secured creditors may have priority over other secured creditors. For example, a tax lien on the debtor's property may have priority over a mortgage lien. In this case, the tax lien must be paid in full before the mortgage lien is paid. Priority claims can complicate the payment process for secured creditors.

4. Sale of Property

If the debtor cannot repay the secured debt, the secured creditor may seize and sell the collateral. The sale proceeds are used to pay the secured claim, and any remaining funds are distributed to other creditors. However, if the sale proceeds are not enough to pay the secured claim in full, the secured creditor may have an unsecured claim for the remaining balance.

5. Reaffirmation Agreements

In some cases, a debtor may want to keep the collateral and continue making payments on the debt. The debtor and secured creditor may enter into a reaffirmation agreement, which allows the debtor to keep the property and continue making payments. The reaffirmed debt is not discharged in bankruptcy, and the secured creditor retains its security interest in the property.

Paying secured creditors in bankruptcy can be a complex process that depends on several factors. Secured creditors have a higher priority than unsecured creditors, but priority claims and the sale of property can complicate the payment process. Reaffirmation agreements may be an option for debtors who want to keep the collateral and continue making payments. Ultimately, the best option for paying secured creditors in bankruptcy depends on the specific circumstances of the debtor's case.

How Secured Creditors are Paid in Bankruptcy - Secured Creditors: Absolute Priority and the Rights of Secured Creditors

How Secured Creditors are Paid in Bankruptcy - Secured Creditors: Absolute Priority and the Rights of Secured Creditors


2.Secured Claims and Cramdown[Original Blog]

When a debtor files for bankruptcy, it is common for creditors to assert secured claims against the debtor's assets. A secured claim is a claim that is secured by a collateral, such as a mortgage on a house or a lien on a car. In bankruptcy, secured claims receive priority over unsecured claims, meaning that secured creditors are entitled to receive payment before unsecured creditors. However, what happens when a secured creditor disagrees with the debtor's proposed reorganization plan? This is where the concept of cramdown comes in.

Cramdown is a bankruptcy term that refers to the ability of a debtor to force a reorganization plan on creditors, even if some of the creditors object to the plan. Cramdown can be used in the context of both secured and unsecured claims, but in this section, we will focus on secured claims and how they are treated in a cramdown.

1. What is a cramdown of a secured claim?

In a cramdown of a secured claim, the debtor proposes a reorganization plan that modifies the terms of the secured creditor's claim. For example, the debtor may propose to reduce the interest rate on the secured debt or extend the repayment period. If the creditor does not agree to the proposed modifications, the court can still confirm the plan if it meets certain criteria.

2. What are the requirements for a cramdown of a secured claim?

To cramdown a secured claim, the debtor's proposed plan must meet the following requirements:

- The plan must be proposed in good faith.

- The secured creditor must receive payments over time that are equal to the present value of the secured claim.

- The plan must not discriminate unfairly against any class of creditors.

- The plan must be feasible.

3. What is the effect of a cramdown on a secured creditor?

A cramdown can have a significant impact on a secured creditor. The modifications to the secured claim can result in a reduction in the amount of money that the creditor will receive over time. Additionally, the creditor may have to wait longer to receive payments, which can affect its cash flow and ability to finance other projects.

4. What are the options for a secured creditor in a cramdown?

If a secured creditor does not agree to the proposed modifications in a cramdown, it has several options, including:

- Objecting to the plan and arguing that it does not meet the requirements for confirmation.

- Negotiating with the debtor to try to reach a compromise.

- Pursuing other remedies, such as foreclosure or repossession of the collateral.

5. What is the best option for a secured creditor in a cramdown?

The best option for a secured creditor in a cramdown will depend on the specific circumstances of the case. In some cases, it may be in the creditor's best interest to negotiate with the debtor to reach a compromise. In other cases, it may be better to pursue other remedies, such as foreclosure or repossession of the collateral. Ultimately, the goal for the secured creditor is to receive the maximum amount of money possible while minimizing the risk of loss.

Cramdown can be a powerful tool for debtors in bankruptcy, but it can also have a significant impact on secured creditors. Secured creditors should carefully consider their options and work with experienced bankruptcy attorneys to protect their interests in a cramdown.

Secured Claims and Cramdown - Cramdown: Achieving Fair and Equitable Outcomes in Bankruptcy

Secured Claims and Cramdown - Cramdown: Achieving Fair and Equitable Outcomes in Bankruptcy


3.Secured Claims and Their Priority in Accounting Insolvency[Original Blog]

Secured Claims and Their Priority in Accounting Insolvency

When a company becomes insolvent, there are various claims that arise from creditors and stakeholders. These claims are ranked in a hierarchy, with some claims being given priority over others. One such claim that is given priority is a secured claim. In this section, we will discuss secured claims and their priority in accounting insolvency.

A secured claim is a claim that is secured by a specific asset or property of the debtor. This means that if the debtor defaults on the loan or debt, the creditor has the right to take possession of the asset or property that was used as collateral. Secured claims are given priority in accounting insolvency because they have a higher chance of being paid back than unsecured claims.

Here are some insights from different points of view regarding secured claims and their priority in accounting insolvency:

1. From the perspective of a creditor, having a secured claim provides a sense of security. If the debtor defaults on the loan or debt, the creditor can take possession of the collateral and sell it to recover the amount owed. This reduces the risk of the creditor losing their investment.

2. From the perspective of a debtor, secured claims may be more attractive because they often come with lower interest rates. This is because the creditor has the security of the collateral, which reduces the risk of default.

3. From the perspective of an insolvency practitioner, secured claims are important because they can be used to fund the insolvency process. If the secured creditor takes possession of the collateral, they can sell it and use the proceeds to pay for the costs of the insolvency process.

Now, let's take a look at the priority of secured claims in accounting insolvency:

1. First priority secured claims are those that are secured by a fixed charge over specific assets. These assets are usually land, buildings, or plant and machinery. If the debtor defaults on the loan or debt, the creditor has the right to take possession of the assets.

2. Second priority secured claims are those that are secured by a floating charge over the debtor's assets. This means that the creditor has a claim over the debtor's assets, but they do not have the right to take possession of them until the debtor defaults on the loan or debt.

3. Third priority secured claims are those that are secured by a combination of a fixed charge and a floating charge. These claims are ranked lower than first and second priority secured claims.

It is important to note that if there are not enough assets to cover all secured claims, the priority of the claims will determine the order in which they are paid. For example, if there are not enough assets to cover first priority secured claims, second priority secured claims will be paid before third priority secured claims.

Secured claims are an important part of the hierarchy of accounting insolvency. They are given priority because they provide a sense of security to creditors and have a higher chance of being paid back than unsecured claims. The priority of secured claims is determined by the type of security and the order in which they were created.

Secured Claims and Their Priority in Accounting Insolvency - Understanding Priority Claims in the Hierarchy of Accounting Insolvency

Secured Claims and Their Priority in Accounting Insolvency - Understanding Priority Claims in the Hierarchy of Accounting Insolvency


4.Understanding Priority Claims[Original Blog]

Priority claims are a crucial aspect of bankruptcy proceedings. They determine the order in which creditors are paid when a debtor files for bankruptcy. Priority claims are claims with a higher priority than other claims, which means they get paid before other debts. understanding priority claims is essential for both creditors and debtors to navigate bankruptcy proceedings effectively.

Here are some insights from different perspectives on priority claims:

1. From a debtor's perspective: Debtors must understand priority claims to know which debts they need to pay first. Failing to pay priority claims could result in the bankruptcy court dismissing their case. Therefore, debtors must prioritize paying priority claims to avoid any legal complications.

2. From a creditor's perspective: Creditors with priority claims have a better chance of getting paid than other creditors. Therefore, creditors must understand the priority claim system to know how likely they are to get paid and how much they can expect to receive.

3. From a bankruptcy court's perspective: The bankruptcy court must determine which claims are priority claims and which are not. They use the Bankruptcy Code to determine the order in which claims are paid.

Now, let's take a look at some of the different types of priority claims:

1. Administrative claims: These are expenses incurred by the bankruptcy estate after the debtor files for bankruptcy. Examples include attorney fees, trustee fees, and expenses related to selling the debtor's assets.

2. Priority unsecured claims: These are claims that are not secured by collateral but have a higher priority than general unsecured claims. Examples include taxes owed to the government and wages owed to employees.

3. Secured claims: These are claims that are secured by collateral, such as a mortgage or car loan. They have a lower priority than administrative and priority unsecured claims.

When it comes to cramdowns and their effect on priority claims, there are several options to consider:

1. Surrender the collateral: Debtors can surrender collateral to avoid cramdowns. This option is best when the collateral is worth less than the debt owed.

2. Pay the entire debt: Debtors can pay the entire debt owed on the collateral to avoid cramdowns. This option is best when the debtor has the means to pay the debt.

3. Cramdown the secured claim: Debtors can cramdown the secured claim by reducing the amount owed to the value of the collateral. This option is best when the collateral is worth more than the debt owed.

Understanding priority claims is essential for both creditors and debtors to navigate bankruptcy proceedings effectively. There are several types of priority claims, and cramdowns can have an effect on them. Knowing the different options available can help debtors make informed decisions about how to proceed.

Understanding Priority Claims - Priority claims: Crammeddown and Its Effect on Priority Claims

Understanding Priority Claims - Priority claims: Crammeddown and Its Effect on Priority Claims


5.Types of Claims and Interests Subject to Cramdown[Original Blog]

When a company is going through a reorganization process, it is common to encounter a scenario where creditors do not agree with the proposed plan and refuse to accept it. In such cases, a cramdown comes into play. Cramdown is a legal provision that allows the court to approve a reorganization plan despite the objections of creditors. However, not all claims and interests are subject to cramdown. In this section, we will discuss the different types of claims and interests subject to cramdown.

1. Secured Claims

Secured claims are debts that are backed by collateral. In a cramdown scenario, the court can modify the terms of the secured claim, including the interest rate, payment period, and the value of the collateral. The court can also reduce the amount of the secured claim to the value of the collateral. For example, if a creditor has a $100,000 secured claim backed by a property worth $80,000, the court can modify the claim to $80,000.

2. Unsecured Claims

Unsecured claims are debts that are not backed by collateral. In a cramdown, the court can modify the terms of the unsecured claim, including the interest rate, payment period, and the amount of the claim. The court can also reduce the amount of the unsecured claim to the amount that the creditor would receive in a Chapter 7 liquidation. For example, if a creditor has a $50,000 unsecured claim, but the company's assets are only worth $30,000, the court can reduce the claim to $30,000.

3. Equity Interests

Equity interests represent ownership in the company, such as stocks or partnership interests. In a cramdown, the court can modify the terms of the equity interests, including the number of shares, voting rights, and dividend payments. The court can also cancel the equity interests altogether. For example, if a company has 100 shares of stock, the court can reduce the number of shares to 50 or cancel them altogether.

4. Priority Claims

Priority claims are debts that are given priority over other claims, such as taxes or wages owed to employees. In a cramdown, the court can modify the terms of the priority claim, including the interest rate, payment period, and the amount of the claim. The court can also reduce the amount of the priority claim to the amount that the creditor would receive in a Chapter 7 liquidation.

5. Intercreditor Disputes

Intercreditor disputes arise when there are multiple creditors with conflicting claims to the same collateral. In a cramdown, the court can resolve intercreditor disputes by determining the priority of the claims and modifying the terms of the claims accordingly.

Cramdown is a powerful tool that can help companies reorganize successfully. However, not all claims and interests are subject to cramdown. Understanding the different types of claims and interests subject to cramdown is essential for companies going through a reorganization process. By understanding the options available, companies can develop a successful reorganization plan that meets the needs of both the company and its creditors.

Types of Claims and Interests Subject to Cramdown - Cramdown: The Backbone of a Successful Reorganization Plan

Types of Claims and Interests Subject to Cramdown - Cramdown: The Backbone of a Successful Reorganization Plan


6.Secured, Unsecured, and Priority Debts[Original Blog]

In the complex world of bankruptcy proceedings, understanding the hierarchy of claims is crucial for all parties involved. When a company or individual files for bankruptcy, their debts are categorized into different classes based on their priority and security. This classification determines the order in which creditors will be paid and plays a significant role in the reorganization process. Examining the hierarchy of claims sheds light on how interests are balanced in bankruptcy proceedings, ensuring a fair distribution of assets among creditors.

1. Secured Debts:

Secured debts take precedence over other types of claims due to their collateralized nature. These debts are backed by specific assets that can be seized or sold if the debtor fails to repay them. The creditor holding a secured claim has a legal right to the collateral and can enforce it to recover their debt. For example, if a business takes out a loan to purchase equipment and uses that equipment as collateral, the lender has a secured claim on that equipment. In case of default, the lender can seize and sell the equipment to satisfy the debt.

2. Unsecured Debts:

Unsecured debts do not have any collateral backing them, making them riskier for creditors. These debts include credit card bills, medical expenses, personal loans, and other obligations without specific assets tied to them. In bankruptcy proceedings, unsecured debts are typically paid after secured debts but before priority debts. However, they often receive only a fraction of what is owed since there may not be enough assets available to fully satisfy these claims.

3. Priority Debts:

Priority debts hold a higher rank than unsecured debts and must be paid before unsecured creditors receive any payment. These debts are given priority status due to their importance in public policy or fairness considerations. Examples of priority debts include certain taxes owed to government agencies, child support payments, alimony obligations, and unpaid wages owed to employees. Priority debts are intended to protect the interests of specific groups, such as government entities and individuals who rely on support payments.

4. Subcategories of Priority Debts:

Priority debts can be further divided into subcategories, each with its own level of priority. For instance, in chapter 7 bankruptcy cases, administrative expenses incurred during the bankruptcy process, such as legal fees and trustee costs, are given the highest priority among all claims. These expenses must be paid before any other debts are satisfied.

Secured, Unsecured, and Priority Debts - Absolute Priority in Reorganization: Balancing Interests in Bankruptcy update

Secured, Unsecured, and Priority Debts - Absolute Priority in Reorganization: Balancing Interests in Bankruptcy update


7.Alternatives to Automatic Stay Lift[Original Blog]

Sometimes, creditors may face difficulties in obtaining their due payments during a bankruptcy filing. Automatic stay is a legal provision that helps debtors in preventing creditors from collecting debts against them. However, creditors may not always find automatic stay an effective solution. In such cases, creditors may opt for alternatives to automatic stay lift that can help them recover their due payments while the debtor is still under bankruptcy protection.

Here are some alternatives to automatic stay lift that creditors can consider:

1. Filing a Motion for Relief from Stay: Creditors can file a motion for relief from stay in bankruptcy court, which will allow them to lift the stay and resume collection efforts against the debtor. The creditor must show sufficient evidence that they are not being paid, and the debtor will not be harmed if the stay is lifted.

2. Filing an Adversary Proceeding: Creditors can file an adversary proceeding in bankruptcy court, which is a separate lawsuit against the debtor. This lawsuit allows the creditor to collect their due payments while the debtor is under bankruptcy protection.

3. Seeking Relief under Secured Debt: Creditors who have secured debts can seek relief under the Bankruptcy Code, which allows them to recover their collateral or receive payment for their secured claim.

4. Filing a Proof of Claim: Creditors can file a proof of claim in bankruptcy court, which is a document that outlines the creditor's claim against the debtor. If the claim is approved, the creditor can receive payment from the debtor's assets.

For example, if a creditor has a secured debt, they can file a motion for relief from stay or seek relief under the Bankruptcy Code to recover their collateral or receive payment for their secured claim. On the other hand, if a creditor has an unsecured debt, they can file a proof of claim or file an adversary proceeding to collect their due payments while the debtor is still under bankruptcy protection.

Alternatives to Automatic Stay Lift - Automatic Stay Lift: Restoring Creditor Rights in Bankruptcy

Alternatives to Automatic Stay Lift - Automatic Stay Lift: Restoring Creditor Rights in Bankruptcy


8.Explaining Absolute Priority and its Role in Bankruptcy Proceedings[Original Blog]

In the complex world of bankruptcy proceedings, understanding the concept of absolute priority is crucial. Absolute priority refers to the order in which creditors are entitled to receive payment from the assets of a bankrupt entity. It plays a significant role in ensuring fairness and equitable distribution of resources during the bankruptcy process. In this section, we will delve into the basics of absolute priority, exploring its significance and implications from various perspectives.

1. The Foundation of Absolute Priority:

Absolute priority is rooted in the fundamental principle that creditors with higher priority must be paid in full before those with lower priority receive any payment. This principle ensures that creditors are treated fairly and that their claims are satisfied according to their respective rights.

2. Secured vs. Unsecured Creditors:

When it comes to absolute priority, a distinction is made between secured and unsecured creditors. Secured creditors hold a specific claim on certain assets as collateral for their loans, while unsecured creditors do not have such security. In bankruptcy proceedings, secured creditors generally have a higher priority than unsecured creditors.

For example, consider a bankrupt company with $1 million in assets and two creditors: Bank A with a secured claim of $500,000 and Bank B with an unsecured claim of $700,000. In this scenario, Bank A would have absolute priority over Bank B since it holds a secured claim.

3. The Role of Equity Holders:

Equity holders, such as shareholders or owners of the bankrupt entity, typically fall at the bottom of the absolute priority ladder. They have the lowest priority for receiving any distribution from the remaining assets after all other creditors' claims have been satisfied.

Continuing with our previous example, if there were equity holders in the bankrupt company mentioned above, they would only receive payment if there were any remaining assets after satisfying both Bank A's and Bank B's claims.

4. Exceptions to Absolute Priority:

While absolute priority is generally upheld in bankruptcy proceedings, there are certain exceptions that allow for deviations from this principle. One such exception is the ability to propose a reorganization plan that deviates from the strict order of priority.

For instance, if the bankrupt company in our example proposed a reorganization plan that would pay Bank B in full before satisfying Bank A's claim, it could be approved by the bankruptcy court if it meets certain criteria. This exception allows for flexibility in addressing unique circumstances and promoting the rehabilitation of distressed entities.

5. The Cramdown Provision:

Another important aspect related to absolute priority is the cramdown provision.

Explaining Absolute Priority and its Role in Bankruptcy Proceedings - Absolute Priority and Plan Confirmation: Ensuring Fairness in Bankruptcy update

Explaining Absolute Priority and its Role in Bankruptcy Proceedings - Absolute Priority and Plan Confirmation: Ensuring Fairness in Bankruptcy update


9.The Automatic Stay and the Discharge[Original Blog]

One of the most important aspects of bankruptcy is how it affects the rights and obligations of creditors who have a lien on the debtor's property. A lien is a legal claim that gives a creditor the right to seize, sell, or use the property as a source of payment for a debt. A lien can be voluntary, such as a mortgage or a car loan, or involuntary, such as a tax lien or a judgment lien. A corporate lien is a type of involuntary lien that arises when a corporation owes money to another entity, such as a supplier, a contractor, or a government agency.

When a debtor files for bankruptcy, two main provisions of the bankruptcy code come into play: the automatic stay and the discharge. The automatic stay is a court order that stops all collection actions against the debtor and the debtor's property, including liens. The discharge is a court order that releases the debtor from personal liability for certain debts, meaning that the debtor no longer has to pay them. However, the automatic stay and the discharge do not affect liens in the same way. Depending on the type of bankruptcy and the type of lien, a lien may survive the bankruptcy process and remain attached to the debtor's property, even after the discharge. This can have significant implications for both the debtor and the creditor. In this section, we will explore how bankruptcy affects corporate liens from different perspectives, and provide some examples to illustrate the main points.

- From the debtor's perspective: Bankruptcy can be a way to get rid of or reduce the amount of corporate liens on the debtor's property. Depending on the type of bankruptcy, the debtor may be able to avoid, redeem, or cram down a corporate lien.

- To avoid a lien means to remove it from the property, making the property free and clear of the lien. This can be done in Chapter 7 bankruptcy if the lien impairs an exemption, which is a legal protection that allows the debtor to keep a certain amount of equity in the property. For example, if the debtor has a $10,000 exemption in a car worth $15,000, and a corporate lien of $8,000, the debtor can avoid the lien and keep the car, as the lien impairs the exemption by $3,000.

- To redeem a lien means to pay the creditor the current market value of the property, regardless of the amount of the lien. This can be done in Chapter 7 bankruptcy if the property is tangible personal property, such as a car or a computer, and the lien is a purchase-money security interest, which means that the creditor financed the purchase of the property. For example, if the debtor owes $20,000 on a car loan, but the car is worth only $10,000, the debtor can redeem the car by paying the creditor $10,000 and getting rid of the lien.

- To cram down a lien means to reduce the amount of the lien to the current market value of the property, and pay the creditor in installments over time. This can be done in Chapter 13 bankruptcy if the property is either personal property or real property that is not the debtor's principal residence, and the lien is either a purchase-money security interest or a non-purchase-money security interest, which means that the creditor did not finance the purchase of the property. For example, if the debtor owes $50,000 on a corporate lien that was placed on the debtor's business equipment worth $30,000, the debtor can cram down the lien to $30,000 and pay the creditor in monthly payments over the duration of the Chapter 13 plan, which can be three to five years. The remaining $20,000 of the lien will be treated as an unsecured debt, which may be discharged at the end of the plan.

- From the creditor's perspective: Bankruptcy can be a threat to the creditor's ability to recover the debt from the debtor's property. Depending on the type of bankruptcy and the type of lien, the creditor may lose the lien entirely, or receive less than the full amount of the lien. However, the creditor may also have some options to protect or enforce the lien in bankruptcy.

- One option is to challenge the debtor's exemption, if the debtor tries to avoid the lien by claiming that it impairs an exemption. The creditor can argue that the debtor's exemption is invalid, excessive, or fraudulent, and that the lien should not be avoided. For example, if the debtor claims a $10,000 exemption in a car worth $15,000, and a corporate lien of $8,000, the creditor can challenge the exemption by showing that the car is actually worth $18,000, or that the debtor has another car that is not exempt, or that the debtor transferred the car to a relative before filing for bankruptcy.

- Another option is to request relief from the automatic stay, if the creditor wants to continue the collection actions against the debtor or the debtor's property, despite the bankruptcy filing. The creditor can ask the court to lift the stay for cause, such as lack of adequate protection, bad faith, or no equity. For example, if the debtor has a corporate lien on a piece of machinery that is depreciating rapidly, or that the debtor is not maintaining properly, the creditor can request relief from the stay to seize and sell the machinery, or to require the debtor to pay for the depreciation or maintenance.

- A third option is to file a proof of claim, if the creditor wants to participate in the distribution of the debtor's assets in bankruptcy. The creditor can file a document with the court that states the amount and the nature of the debt, and attach any evidence that supports the claim, such as a contract, an invoice, or a lien. The creditor can also file a secured claim, which means that the creditor has a lien on the debtor's property, and an unsecured claim, which means that the creditor does not have a lien. For example, if the debtor owes $50,000 on a corporate lien that was crammed down to $30,000 in Chapter 13 bankruptcy, the creditor can file a secured claim for $30,000 and an unsecured claim for $20,000, and receive payments from the debtor's plan according to the priority and the percentage of the claims.

As you can see, bankruptcy can have a significant impact on corporate liens, and both the debtor and the creditor have to consider the advantages and disadvantages of the different options available to them. Bankruptcy can be a complex and confusing process, and it is advisable to seek professional guidance before taking any action. If you have any questions or comments about this section, please let me know. I hope you found this section helpful and informative. Thank you for using Bing.

OSZAR »