This page is a compilation of blog sections we have around this keyword. Each header is linked to the original blog. Each link in Italic is a link to another keyword. Since our content corner has now more than 4,500,000 articles, readers were asking for a feature that allows them to read/discover blogs that revolve around certain keywords.

+ Free Help and discounts from FasterCapital!
Become a partner

The keyword waiting time has 1109 sections. Narrow your search by selecting any of the keywords below:

1.Identifying the Desired Result[Original Blog]

One of the key steps in conducting a cost-minimization analysis is to define the given outcome that you want to achieve. This means identifying the desired result that you are aiming for, and specifying the criteria that you will use to measure it. By doing this, you can ensure that you are comparing different options that have the same or equivalent outcomes, and that you are not overlooking any important aspects of the problem. In this section, we will discuss how to define the given outcome in a clear and precise way, and how to avoid some common pitfalls and challenges. We will also provide some examples of how to apply this step in different contexts and scenarios.

To define the given outcome, you can follow these steps:

1. State the overall goal or objective of your analysis. This is the broad and general statement of what you want to achieve or accomplish. For example, if you are a hospital manager who wants to reduce the waiting time for patients, your overall goal might be to improve the efficiency and quality of care in your hospital.

2. Break down the goal into specific and measurable outcomes. These are the concrete and quantifiable indicators that show whether you have achieved your goal or not. They should be SMART: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. For example, if your goal is to improve the efficiency and quality of care in your hospital, some specific outcomes might be to reduce the average waiting time for patients by 10% in six months, to increase the patient satisfaction rate by 15% in one year, and to decrease the readmission rate by 5% in two years.

3. Choose the most relevant and important outcome for your analysis. Depending on your goal and context, you might have multiple outcomes that you want to achieve. However, for the purpose of cost-minimization analysis, you need to focus on one outcome that is the most relevant and important for your decision-making. This is the given outcome that you will use to compare different options and find the least costly one. For example, if your goal is to improve the efficiency and quality of care in your hospital, you might decide that the most relevant and important outcome for your analysis is to reduce the average waiting time for patients by 10% in six months. This is because this outcome has a direct impact on the patient experience and the hospital reputation, and it is also achievable and measurable within a reasonable time frame.

4. Define the outcome in operational terms. This means specifying how you will measure and evaluate the outcome, and what data and methods you will use to do so. You should also define the baseline and target values for the outcome, and the assumptions and limitations that you have made in your analysis. For example, if your given outcome is to reduce the average waiting time for patients by 10% in six months, you might define it as follows:

- Measurement: The average waiting time for patients is measured as the time elapsed from the moment they arrive at the hospital until the moment they are seen by a doctor or a nurse. This excludes the time spent on registration, triage, tests, or other procedures that are not directly related to the consultation.

- Data: The data on the waiting time for patients is collected from the hospital information system, which records the arrival and departure times of each patient. The data is updated daily and aggregated monthly.

- Method: The average waiting time for patients is calculated as the mean of the waiting times for all patients who visited the hospital in a given month. The percentage change in the average waiting time is calculated as the difference between the baseline and the target values, divided by the baseline value, multiplied by 100.

- Baseline: The baseline value for the average waiting time for patients is 45 minutes, which is the average waiting time for patients who visited the hospital in the last six months before the start of the analysis.

- Target: The target value for the average waiting time for patients is 40.5 minutes, which is 10% lower than the baseline value.

- Assumptions: The assumptions made in the analysis are that the demand for the hospital services remains constant, that the quality and safety of care are not compromised, and that the hospital staff and resources are sufficient and efficient.

- Limitations: The limitations of the analysis are that the data on the waiting time for patients might not be accurate or complete, that the waiting time might vary depending on the type and severity of the patient's condition, and that the waiting time might not capture the full patient experience or satisfaction.

By defining the given outcome in this way, you can ensure that you have a clear and precise definition of the desired result that you want to achieve, and that you can compare different options that have the same or equivalent outcomes. This will help you to conduct a valid and reliable cost-minimization analysis, and to find the least costly option for achieving your given outcome.

OSZAR »